Federal Capital Budget Plan Draws Defense Industry Interest, Concern

National Defense, April 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Federal Capital Budget Plan Draws Defense Industry Interest, Concern


Pesident Clinton in March 1997 issued Executive Order 13037, which created a commission to study the possibility of establishing a federal capital budget. This was prompted by a request from Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ)-and as many believed to secure the senators vote against the balanced budget amendment.

The Commission to Study Capital Budgeting will submit its findings to the White House by midDecember. The report svl specifically detail:

* Capital budgeting techniques used by private sector entities and state governments.

* What constitutes a federal capital expenditure

* How to determine depreciation at the federal level.

* The effect of capital budgeting on federal budgetary choices and potential choices for budgetary discipline.

While there may be merit to capital budgeting, industry is only now beginning to look at the prospect of a federal capital budget. Those in the defense sector who have been advised of the developing situation have obvious concerns about the potential impact the establishment of capital budgets could have on the defense budget.

An actual switch to capital budgeting procedures could profoundly change the we ay the government prioritizes defense spending, particularly if elements of defense are not considered to be a "capital" investment.

Generally, the term capital is used to describe an item purchased to make money or produce other goods and resources. Perhaps most important to those concerned about capital budgeting procedures on the federal level is the definition of what will constitute a federal capital expenditure.

Yet, can one assign such an economic value to the nation's security? While capital expenditures may be less difficult to define for individual businesses or state governments, such classifications would be considerably more complex to make when planning the federal budget. Lawmakers would be forced to examine exactly what constitutes capital in the formulation of the federal budget, and how to decide the kev elements of a nations infrastructure.

Most perplexing would be deciding how to put a value on what contributes to economic growth. Considering that most segments of the federal budget combine what would be classified as traditional capital investment spending with current-use spending, such classifications are, indeed, difficult.

Those in favor of capital budgets contend that such measures are the optimal means by which the nation can make much needed restorations to its deteriorating infrastructure. The United States is lagging in terms of infrastructure investment in capital planning, with only 7 percent of its revenues used for that purpose.

The proponents of capital budgets assert that major capital improvements could be funded for the federal government much as they are on the state level, with the federal government borrowing to finance and invest in such improvements. State and local governments, however, are limited by the financial market and their respective abilities to pay back loans.

The federal government is not likely to be under the same constraints and, thus, would be able to borrow to make capital improvements without any real limitations. In response to this, an annual cap on expenditures, as well as ways of limiting federal indebtedness, have been proposed.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Federal Capital Budget Plan Draws Defense Industry Interest, Concern
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?