Defamation Liability of Employers for Compelled Self-Publication: A Hot Trend That Fizzled

By Shearer, Robert A.; Icenogle, Marjorie | Labor Law Journal, Winter 2012 | Go to article overview

Defamation Liability of Employers for Compelled Self-Publication: A Hot Trend That Fizzled


Shearer, Robert A., Icenogle, Marjorie, Labor Law Journal


I. Introduction

Compelled self-publication is a legal theory that once promised to negate a popular strategy employers use to defend against charges of defamation for employee references. This strategy requires company representatives to adhere to a strict "no comment" policy when asked for information about former employees who have applied for jobs elsewhere. The rationale for such a policy is that absent the employer's communicating or "publishing" negative information regarding a former employee, a critical element of the tort of defamation cannot be established. However, the theory of compelled self-publication could provide employees who were terminated for reasons that are false or unsubstantiated a cause of action for libel or slander against former employers even when the former employer has not communicated with prospective employers. This legal theory recognizes that in the process of applying for a new job, it is foreseeable that a former employee, who was terminated for cause, might very well be called upon to explain the circumstances under which he/she left the previous job. If so, the applicant in essence is "compelled" to disclose the reason for termination. If the termination was for a reason not supported by facts, naturally the employee would be expected to defend her/himself against the false accusations. Consequently, even though the previous employer, acting consistently with its "no comment" policy, communicated nothing to prospective employers, the employee could claim to have been defamed.

While it once appeared that a trend was developing in support of defamation liability based upon compelled self-publication, more recent court rulings in several jurisdictions have rejected the theory and reaffirmed the traditional requirement of actual publication by the employer to third parties in order to establish a cause of action for defamation. In addition, at least 36 states have statutes granting qualified immunity to employers when providing job references.1 Our research suggests the probability of a former employee winning a defamation claim based on a factual reference is low. A review of court decisions suggests that good employees would be better served if they could secure a favorable reference from previous employers, and employers could make better hiring decisions and reduce the costs of hiring poorly performing employees, if employers would provide factual references to prospective employers.

II. Defamation Requirements and Defenses

In the context of employment references, to establish a typical cause of action for defamation, the plaintiff must prove that an employer or the employer's agent communicated to a prospective employer a false statement of fact that damaged the plaintiff's reputation, effectively resulting in the person not being hired.2 The requirement that the defamatory statement must be communicated or "published," to someone other than the employee lies behind the common practice of refusing to disclose any details about former employees other than innocuous information such as dates of employment and job titles. In effect, to insulate themselves from liability for libel or slander, many employers have adopted a "no comment" policy with regard to former employees, whether they were excellent performers, poor performers, or even dangerous characters.3

Although simply avoiding publication of information to third parties reduces the threat of liability for defamation, the defenses of truth and "qualified privilege" make it unlikely that a former employee's lawsuit would be successful if the information was accurate or, even if the information was not true, but communicated in good faith. In this context, "good faith" means that the employer had a reasonable belief that the statements were correct.4

Since truth is an absolute defense to a claim of defamation, a thorough, objective investigation can establish a documented, factual basis for terminating an employee or negotiating a resignation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Defamation Liability of Employers for Compelled Self-Publication: A Hot Trend That Fizzled
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.