Witness Intimidation in International Trials: Balancing the Need for Protection against the Rights of the Accused

By Trotter, Andrew | The George Washington International Law Review, July 1, 2012 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Witness Intimidation in International Trials: Balancing the Need for Protection against the Rights of the Accused


Trotter, Andrew, The George Washington International Law Review


ABSTRACT

Over the past decade, the international criminal tribunals have encountered extensive problems with witness intimidation. This has led to the injury and death of individuals, and to the withdrawal of testimony and the dropping of charges. There are two main ways in which this problem can be concurrently approached: by detaining the accused in custody, and by protecting the identities and welfare of witnesses. Both of these, however, incur a degree of prejudice to the accused. This Essay explores the extent of the problem, and the degree to which each of these methods can be fairly employed to safeguard both the welfare of witnesses and victims and the interests of justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The security of witnesses is of great importance to international tribunals. The intimidation of individuals who propose to testify for or against an accused is not only dangerous on a human level for witnesses and their families, it also undermines the integrity of the trial and the quality of justice delivered for the victims of the gravest crimes. The nature of the crimes prosecuted by the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR) is that they tend to expose witnesses to greater threats than might ordinarily be experienced in domestic jurisdictions. An important objective of these tribunals is to produce justice for large populations that have suffered extensively.1 The process requires that victims participate as witnesses, and it is counterproductive if prosecuting those perpetrators perpetuates risks of danger or creates new risks to them.

Accordingly, the ad hoc tribunals, like other domestic and internationalized jurisdictions, go to great lengths to protect the interests of victims and witnesses.2 At the International Criminal Court (ICC), there is an independent duty on the Chamber to "take appropriate measures to protect the safety, physical and psychological well-being . . . of witnesses."3 Despite the best efforts of the tribunals, however, the incidence of witness intimidation has been unacceptably high.4 This Essay examines the extent of the problem and the merits of the available solutions. Part II gives an overview of prominent instances of witness intimidation at the ICTY, the ICTR, and the ICC. Part III considers the use of preventative detention of defendants and the extent to which it can and should be done without coming into conflict with the rights of the accused. Part IV examines the evolution of witness protection programs and the effectiveness and limits of different protective measures.

II. THE PROBLEM

Witness intimidation has been a grave problem at both the ICTY and the ICTR. At the ICTY, in Prosecutor v. Tadic, threats to the victim's family resulted in the victim's withdrawal as a witness and, in the absence of sufficient evidence, forced the charges to be dropped.5 Tadic was not only the first defendant to come before the ICTY,6 but the first defendant to ever face charges for rape as a crime against humanity.7 Rape trials are particularly susceptible to interference by witness intimidation because of the personal and traumatic nature of the crime,8 and their typically heavy reliance on the testimony of the victim.9

This is by no means an isolated problem. The rape conviction recorded in Prosecutor v. Kunarac10 came with great difficulty, after several witnesses either refused to testify or unexpectedly withdrew on late notice.11 Female refugees testifying at the ICTY in 1998 feared reprisals if sent back to Bosnia, and high-level tribunal officials reportedly lamented that the level of intimidation "exposed our inability to protect people."12 In 2000, allegations leveled against the accused and his counsel in Prosecutor v. Avramovic and Simic of intimidating and bribing several witnesses to the case "raised grave suspicions."13 In the same year, a "potential witness" for the prosecution was killed under questionable circumstances.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Witness Intimidation in International Trials: Balancing the Need for Protection against the Rights of the Accused
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?