Muslim- and Arab-Americans Contemplate Another Vital Bloc Vote in 2004

By Curtiss, Richard H. | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2003 | Go to article overview

Muslim- and Arab-Americans Contemplate Another Vital Bloc Vote in 2004


Curtiss, Richard H., Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


SpecialReport

The story of the bloc vote began 10 years ago, when a number of Muslim- and Arab-Americans and their supporters decided to make elections more effective for their community. The idea was that all members of the community would work together to ensure that they did not cancel out each other's votes every four years.

The idea was first broached at a convention attended by representatives of all the other Muslim- and Arab-American organizations. It did not seem too complicated at first-but the devil was in the details.

At another conference not long afterward, members of the same groups held a private organizational meeting. They agreed to invite members of the Democratic and Republican parties to exploratory meetings, with the hopes of determining for whom Muslim-- Americans might eventually vote in 1996.

After listening to the concerns of the two parties, it seemed that the Republicans were more receptive to what Muslim Americans had to offer than were the Democrats. It was clear that the Democrats were more concerned about alienating the Jewish vote than garnering any Arab or Muslim support.

When the discussions were concluded, the problem emerged that many of the Arab- and Muslim-Americans were predisposed to be Republicans or Democrats first, Arab- or Muslim-Americans second. The bloc vote quickly foundered over those realities. Although it appeared briefly that the Muslim-and Arab-- Americans wanted to meet in Chicago to endorse the Republicans, at the last minute at least two of the major Arab-American groups backed out. An endorsement, therefore, was never made, and once again Republican and Democratic Arab- and Muslim-Americans simply canceled out each other's votes.

Four years later, it was clear to all Muslim-- Americans concerned about making their voices heard that there had to be some ground rules. Happily, by this time some of the smaller Muslim groups had amalgamated, so that the number was no longer quite so unwieldy as four years earlier. An umbrella group, the American Muslim Political Coordinating Council (AMPCC-PAC), was formed to represent every Muslim American organization.

After everyone had their say, it was agreed that a very small number of Muslim Americans-the AMPCC leaders-would select which party would get the entire community's vote. This time, something happened to make the decision even simpler: national Democratic Party candidates would not even participate in the discussions, because they did not believe the Muslim-American groups would be able to implement the bloc vote in the 2000 elections.

The decision, therefore, was simple. Because only the Republicans made informal promises to take Muslim-and Arab-American concerns into policy considerations, Muslim Americans, and many Arab Americans, went Republican.

The result was astonishing: in the extraordinarily tight 2000 election, the bitterly contested vote finally went to the Republicans. In short, the bloc vote made the difference between George W. Bush's election and Al Gore's defeat.

One cannot say for sure how many people actually followed through with the bloc vote, but it was very apparent that, in Florida, a great number of Muslim- and Arab-American voters took the bloc vote seriously, and decisively influenced the election. Obviously, some Democrats now realize that if they had understood the strategic importance of the Muslim-American community, they might not have discounted its vote.

In the subsequent two years, many Arab-- and Muslim-Americans have been deeply disillusioned with Bush's foreign policy decisions, which seem regularly to tilt toward Ariel Sharon's viewpoint rather than that of Palestinians and their American supporters. They also are appalled that, despite his campaign assurances, the Bush administration has made extensive use of profiling and secret evidence in the wake of 9/11.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Muslim- and Arab-Americans Contemplate Another Vital Bloc Vote in 2004
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.