African Exodus-Re-Evaluating an Hypothesis

By Miller, Edward M. | Mankind Quarterly, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

African Exodus-Re-Evaluating an Hypothesis


Miller, Edward M., Mankind Quarterly


African Exodus: The Origin of Modern Humanity Christopher Stringer dc Robin McKie Henry Holt, 1997

That the authors of this book are from two different backgrounds suggests there may be some tension in the book. Christopher Stringer (paleoanthropologist at London's Natural History Museum) is a well known scientist, but Robin McKie is a journalist (science editor of The Observer). African Exodus is a politically correct history of mankind, devoted to defending the Out of Africa theory of human origins, and incidentally arguing that therefore all humans are basically identical. One can speculate that Stringer supplied the basic facts while McKie was responsible for the political gloss.

The organization of the book is chronological, tracing human history from its origins. However, the first chapter is autobiographical, recounting the Stringer's first work on human skulls (done as part of his PhD thesis). It then describes how the Kibish skull from Ethiopia looked modern to him. Yet it dated to about 130,000 years ago (i. e. when Europe was inhabited by Neanderthals with quite different looking skulls). This led him to develop the Out of Africa hypothesis that modern humans had evolved in Africa, probably in East Africa, some of whom later moved out of Africa to populate the world.

This chapter is followed by one arguing for the East African ancestry of modern humans, and then a couple of chapters on the Neanderthals and their replacement by Cro-Magnons. The next two chapters deal with the genetic evidence on human evolution and how that points to an African origin for humans. A chapter is devoted to the apparent intellectual advantages of the Cro-Magnons, and speculation as to just what they had that the Neanderthals lacked that led to their replacement.

The part of the book devoted to reviewing hominid origins appears competent and is certainly very readable. It differs little from other popular accounts. It has the advantage of being more up to date than older ones, carrying the evidence of research into 1996. For instance, it provides a vivid account of the discovery of a Neanderthal infant by Rak (for a scientific description see Rak, Kimbel, & Hovers, 1994), seemingly too different from current Homo sapiens infants to be the same species.

In one case, an interview brings the story more up to date even though the published work was not yet available. The genetic work of Tishkoff and Kidd on a CTI-r repeat on chromosome 12 is described. It provides very powerful evidence for an African origin of the hominids. (A published report is now available in Tishkoff, et al. 1996). Of course, there is always new genetic work, too new to be cited, notably that concerning the Y chromosome (Zerjal, et al. 1997 is a recent example).

Unfortunately, the book went to press too early to give the important finding (Krings, Stone, Schmitz, Krainitzki, Stoneking, & Paabo, 1997) that Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA is sufficiently different from modern humans to make modern Europeans descent from Neanderthals unlikely. This finding greatly weakens the case for any multi-regional hypothesis of human origins in the form advanced by its contemporary exponents, when they argue that Cro-Magnons evolved from Neanderthals. Since the book went to press further evidence suggesting the Neanderthals were not the ancestors of current Europeans has appeared (Richards, et al., 1996, Schwartz & Tattersall, 1966, Holliday, 1967, Armour et al, 1996).

The major errors in the book arise when it moves beyond paleoanthropology and attempts to be politically correct. I suspect McKie (a journalist) may have written these sections, although a co-author such as Stringer certainly deserves to share the blame for obvious errors. Stringer is the author of another recent book on a similar subject (Stringer & Gamble, 1993) which seems free of the political correctness problems of African Exodus.

African Exodus digresses from paleoanthropology (Stringer's area of expertise) to attack The Bell Curve (Herrnstein, & Murray, 1994).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

African Exodus-Re-Evaluating an Hypothesis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?