Information Value of Climate Forecasts for Rainfall Index Insurance for Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage in the Southeast United States

By Nadolnyak, Denis; Vedenov, Dmitry | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, February 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Information Value of Climate Forecasts for Rainfall Index Insurance for Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage in the Southeast United States


Nadolnyak, Denis, Vedenov, Dmitry, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


In this article, possible use of climate forecasts in rainfall index insurance of hay and forage production is considered in a geographical area (southeast United States) relatively heavily impacted by the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Analysis of the stochastic properties of rainfall, yields, and the ENSO forecasts using the copula technique shows that the forecast impact depends on the proximity to the Gulf Coast where the impact of the ENSO is more pronounced and earlier in the year. Stochastic modeling shows that the use of skillful longterm climate forecasts by the insured producers creates intertemporal adverse selection that can be precluded by offering forecast conditional premiums. The impacts on the efficiency of the rainfall index insurance and results of sensitivity analysis with respect to model parameters are discussed.

Key Words: copulas, ENSO forecasts, rainfall index insurance

JEL Classifications: Q14, Q51, R51, R11, R38

Over the past two decades, several alternative designs of agricultural crop insurance have been tried in an attempt to increase participation rates and improve actuarial performance of the program. However, reducing moral hazard and adverse selection inherent in insurance contracts is frequently associated with reduction in the risk covered by insurance (Glauber, 2004). One example is the index-based agricultural insurance that largely avoids the moral hazard issues and can be especially applicable for crops and areas with limited yield/revenue records and where agriculture is more rainfalldependent (Skees, 2008).

In 2007, the U.S. Risk Management Agency (RMA) introduced a pilot program to offer Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage (PRF) insurance that provides protection against losses of forage produced for grazing or harvested for hay (RMA, 2012). Two types of PRF insurance contracts are currently available under the pilot program, both of which are designed to indemnify producers when yield-reducing drought conditions arise. Rainfall Index (RI) contracts indemnify policyholders based on gridded 0.25° latitude by 0.25° longitude rainfall data published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Prediction Center. Vegetation Index (VI) contracts indemnify policyholders based on gridded 4.8 mile ? 4.8 mile Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data published by the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resource Observation Center. In the 201 1 crop year, RI insurance was offered in 16 states and VI insurance in nine states.

Both types of PRF contracts are examples of index insurance. Index insurance differs from the conventional insurance in that it indemnifies policyholders based not on verifiable individual producer losses, but rather on realization of a variable or an "index" that is highly correlated with these losses. Index insurance is generally considered to be free of the moral hazard problems that have undermined the actuarial performance of traditional crop insurance (Halcrow, 1949). However, with index insurance, it is possible for a policyholder to suffer a loss without receiving an indemnity as a result of the basis risk caused by imperfect correlation between the index and the losses. Properly designed index insurance products can minimize basis risk although not completely eliminate it. The benefits, limitations, and optimal design of agricultural index insurance have been thoroughly studied in the literature. Miranda (1991) was the first to analyze the demand for agricultural index insurance in a stylized setting, demonstrating that the optimal quantity of index insurance that a producer should purchase is generally proportional to the correlation between the index and the producer's yields. Mahul (1999, 2001) and Mahul and Wright (2003) extended Miranda's results, examining practical design issues and revenue insurance. Carriquiry and Osgood (2012) developed a theoretical model looking specifically at the impact of climate (weather) forecast availability on producer welfare and demand for index insurance.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Information Value of Climate Forecasts for Rainfall Index Insurance for Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage in the Southeast United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?