The Unrecognized Triumph of Historical Jurisprudence

By Tamanaha, Brian Z. | Texas Law Review, February 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

The Unrecognized Triumph of Historical Jurisprudence


Tamanaha, Brian Z., Texas Law Review


The Unrecognized Triumph of Historical Jurisprudence LAW'S HISTORY: AMERICAN LEGAL THOUGHT AND THE TRANSATLANTIC TURN TO HISTORY. By David M. Rabban. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 564 pages. $85.00.

Historical jurisprudence has been nearly erased from the annals of American jurisprudence. Legal theory revolves around rival schools of thought representing contesting positions. A common arrangement in jurisprudence texts is to begin with natural law and legal positivism, in that order, followed by legal realism, and then a host of contemporary schools of thought.1 This ordering is chronological as well as thematic: natural law theory began in classical times;2 legal positivism arose in the nineteenth century to challenge natural law;3 legal realism arose in the 1920s and 1930s to debunk the dominant formalist views of law;4 the Hart-Fuller debate of the late 1950s marked the reenergizing of legal positivism;5 social scientific approaches to law (Law & Society Movement) began to develop in the 1960s;6 in the 1970s, Dworkin mounted a challenge to Hart's dominance,7 law and economics subjected law to examination from an economic perspective,8 and Critical legal studies of the radical left burst onto the scene to challenge legal liberalism.9 A hodgepodge of descendants of these various schools then followed. Historical jurisprudence is rarely mentioned. In an encyclopedic entry on "The Nature of Law," Andrei Marmor observes:

In the course of the last few centuries, two main rival philosophical traditions have emerged, providing different answers to these questions [on the nature of law]. The older one, dating back to late mediaeval Christian scholarship, is called the natural law tradition. Since the early 19th century, Natural Law theories have been fiercely challenged by the legal positivism tradition promulgated by such scholars as Jeremy Bentham and John Austin.10

Contrast this narrative with a century ago, when Roscoe Pound wrote:

Until recently, it has been possible to divide jurists into three principal groups, according to their views of the nature of law and of the standpoint from which the science of law should be approached. We may call these groups the Philosophical [natural law] School, the Historical School, and the Analytical School.11

Pound and others at the time asserted that in the late nineteenth century the historical school was dominant over the other two jurisprudence schools.12 Natural law was in a state of decline. Renowned Oxford Professor James Bryce, writing in Studies in History and Jurisprudence, published in 1901, identified the same rival jurisprudential schools, but noted that "we now seldom hear the term Law of Nature. It seems to have vanished from the sphere of politics as well as from positive law."13

Not all contemporary jurisprudence scholars have forgotten historical jurisprudence. Robert Summers recognized that "legal theorists of the past two centuries have worked in one or more of the three . . . great jurisprudential traditions-continental natural law theory, British and Austrian analytical positivism, and historical jurisprudence."14 But this is unusual.

That a once-prominent theory of law could be nearly expunged from current memory, at least in the United States,15 is a puzzle that merits explanation. In Law's History, David Rabban aims to reawaken us to the former prominence of historical jurisprudence and to explain its apparent fall. He places much of the blame on Roscoe Pound.

By promoting "sociological jurisprudence" as an attractive alternative to "historical jurisprudence" in his enormously influential early work during the decade before World War I, Roscoe Pound contributed substantially to the demise of historical explanation in American legal scholarship as well as to what became the prevailing, though importantly inaccurate, view of its role in nineteenth-century legal thought.16

Rabban also argues:

Pound was both the last major figure who shared the historical understanding of law that dominated American legal scholarship in the decades after 1870 and the person who did most to bring that era to a close. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Unrecognized Triumph of Historical Jurisprudence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.