Tax Strategy Patents after the America Invents Act: The Need for Judicial Action

By Closson, Nichelle | Journal of Corporation Law, October 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

Tax Strategy Patents after the America Invents Act: The Need for Judicial Action


Closson, Nichelle, Journal of Corporation Law


I. INTRODUCTION

Imagine an accounting firm trying to give advice to its clients about the most effective ways to minimize their tax liability. Associates at the firm may point out the available credits and deductions, and discuss other techniques and strategies the client may be able to use to their advantage. But wait, there is a snag. After conducting some research, an associate discovers that one of the methods recommended to the client has recently been patented. A commonly used strategy employed by tax professionals and average taxpayers alike is now only available to those willing to pay the patent owner royalties for its use. The associate will now have to explain to her client that they may have to pay more in taxes this year because this money-saving strategy is protected by a patent. This is only one example of the threats posed by tax strategy patents, the ability to patent a tax-saving technique and derive income from others who are only seeking to save as much money as possible.

With the passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the Act) in September of 2011, tax strategy patents became one of only three types of business methods that Congress has prohibited the Patent and Trademark Office from issuing-"the other two are medical procedures (because doctors should be able to use any technique [to save a patient's life]) and nuclear technology (for the obvious reasons)."1 The passage of the Act finally ended years of debate and controversy surrounding the patentability of tax strategies. This Note examines that controversy, gives a general history of U.S. patent law, and also gives a more specific legislative timeline leading up to the Act. This Note then analyzes what will happen to the remaining tax strategy patents that the Act did not revoke, and it ultimately argues that courts should be the ones to decide this issue, and they should choose to invalidate the patents.

II. BACKGROUND

Currently, there are more than 160 issued tax strategy patents in the United States, and another 167 applications were pending when the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act was signed into law.2 The Act reforms the current U.S. patent system and ceases the granting of tax strategy patents.3 While the new Act does not affect the existing patents, the new law deems the pending applications prior art.4

This Part gives a brief history of the current state of patent law in the United States and defines both tax strategy patents and business method patents. It gives a historical account of the relevant precedent protecting such patents and explores the public opposition to granting such patents. Finally, it discusses Congress' recent Patent Reform Bill that ended the patentability of tax strategies.

A. Patent Law Generally

"Patent law is as old as the U.S. government"5 and is grounded in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.6 This intellectual property clause grants the federal government the power to enact legislation regarding patents and the protection of patent owners.7 A patent is a federally granted right that enables the owner to exclude others from "mak[ing], us[ing], offer[ing] to sell, or sell[ing]" the invention without the owner's consent.8 Usually, this is equivalent to the holder owning a "state-sanctioned monopoly over the patented invention during the term of the patent."9 In turn, this monopoly allows inventors to recover the costs of research and development, and gives them the ability to monetize their invention.10 This right helps to provide "an incentive to invent and encourages technological progress."11

Currently, the law states that "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter" is entitled to obtain a patent.12 The Patent Act of 195213 grants patents to inventors of these processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter provided that the invention is useful,14 novel,15 nonobvious,16 and the inventions are properly disclosed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Tax Strategy Patents after the America Invents Act: The Need for Judicial Action
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.