Dreams Deferred: Deferred Action, Prosecutorial Discretion, and the Vexing Case(s) of Dream Act Students

By Olivas, Michael A. | The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, December 2012 | Go to article overview

Dreams Deferred: Deferred Action, Prosecutorial Discretion, and the Vexing Case(s) of Dream Act Students


Olivas, Michael A., The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal


Imagine there's no heaven

It's easy if you try. . . .

You, you may say

I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one

I hope some day you'll join us

And the world will be as one. . . .

- John Lennon, "Imagine"1

Introduction: The Aftermath of the DREAM Act Defeats

In Fall 2010, at the urging of Latino groups, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) brought forward abili, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act,2 as the first building block toward future comprehensive immigration reform. As had been the case in 2007, when an earlier attempt had died in the Senate,3 the DREAM Act was tantalizingly close, and followed many public stories about undocumented college students in the media. These continued through the 2010 lameduck session, where once again the votes were not there. The "third time" may be the mythical "charm," but not in this subject matter Democratic backers of the legislation again fell short of the sixty Senate votes required to move the DREAM Act legislation forward in December 2010.4

While the federal legislation option was the best known and most politicized, the action at the state level has increased substantially, and a number of developments have occurred since the December 2010 Congressional failure.5 Subsequent activities at the state level have included Wisconsin (repealed resident tuition statute),6 Maryland (passed resident tuition statute; "frozen" while certified for state ballot measure);7 Rhode Island (state board responsible for residency tuition policy enacted mie allowing residency tuition in 2012);s Illinois (passed state statute allowing schools to award non-state-mnded scholarships to the undocumented);9 California (passed three state statutes: allowing schools to award non-state-funded scholarships, providing state financial assistance, and making special provisions for undocumented student leaders);10 Connecticut (passed resident tuition statute).11 While Maryland placed the issue on the 2012 statewide ballot, there was an effort in California to do the same before the provisions of the new laws were to take effect in 201 3; when the signatures were counted in early January 2012, there were not enough legitimate signatures to certify the measure to the November 2012 ballot.12 In 2012, immigrant groups in Maryland were litigating the ballot measure issue, arguing that the statute had not even been put into effect.13 Rhode Island was the first state to enact residency tuition for undocumented college students by administrative action rather than by a statute, as tuition policy is set administratively in the state.14

From 2010 through 2012, litigation occurred in California,15 Nebraska,16 and Texas17 - upholding state statutes against restrictionist efforts to eliminate the recent tuition provisions. In New Jersey18 and Florida,19 the states were sued due to policies that restricted even citizen residents from receiving residency or financial aid if their parents were out of status. Litigation also was filed in Maryland20 and New York21 on associated residency tuition issues. In addition to these expansive accomodationist initiatives, designed to incorporate undocumented college students into their communities, there have been states that have done the opposite: enacting statutes or policies to prevent the undocumented from receiving resident tuition (redundant, as Sections 1621 and 1623 require affirmative passage of state laws to accord the status)22 (see Table One), and a small number of states ban them outright, including Alabama,23 Indiana,24 and Ohio,25 which did so in 20 1 1 (for these, see Table Two). The 2011 Alabama bill would have restricted even refugees from enrolling, and was enjoined by the federal district judge.26 Additional Alabama provisions affecting K-1 2 students and requiring the state to "inventory" such children were not enjoined by the trial court, but by the Eleventh Circuit.27 Existing New Jersey policy denied state financial aid to a student who was a U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dreams Deferred: Deferred Action, Prosecutorial Discretion, and the Vexing Case(s) of Dream Act Students
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.