Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

A Comparative Analysis of Two Failed Indenture Experiences in Post-Emancipation Caribbean: British Guiana (1838-1843) and Danish St. Croix (1863-1868)

By Roopnarine, Lomarsh | Ibero-americana, January 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

A Comparative Analysis of Two Failed Indenture Experiences in Post-Emancipation Caribbean: British Guiana (1838-1843) and Danish St. Croix (1863-1868)


Roopnarine, Lomarsh, Ibero-americana


I. INTRODUCTION

From a reading of the contributions on Caribbean indentured historiography, one is struck by two fundamental factors. The first is that we have come a long way in the study of the Caribbean Indian indentured experience. Over the past forty years, historians have covered virtually every aspect of indenture - recruitment, immigration, transportation, plantation experience, resistance, repatriation, remittances, accommodation, settlement, cultural identity - in the Caribbean colonies - British Guiana, Trinidad, Jamaica, Suriname, French Guiana, Martinique, Guadeloupe, Grenada, Belize, St. Vincent, St. Lucia, St. Kitts, Nevis, St. Croix - that received indentured Indians (see Hassankhan 2011; Mahase 2008; Roopnarine 2007; Metha 2004; Ramdin 2000, Seecharan 1999; Hoefte 1998; Kale 1998; Laurence 1995; Look Lai 1993; Shepherd 1994; Dabydeen & Samaroo 1987; Haraksingh 1987; Mangru 1987; Moutoussamy 1989; Emmer 1986; Nath 1975; Tinker 1974; Weiler 1968). Of course, analysis of some aspects of indenture still remains to be carried out. The second is the lack of any comparative regional study. Except for Asian Caribbean historian Walton Look Lai's comparative ethnic study on indentured Indians and Chinese and a few other studies on the overall Caribbean Indian indentured experience (see Northrup 1995; Dabydeen and Samaroo 1987; Tinker 1974), there appears to be no comparative study of Indian indentureship in the former British colonies with that of the Dutch, French, or former Danish islands. What has emerged instead from Caribbean Indian indentured studies is an insular focus on former western European Caribbean colonies. For example, Brinsley Samaroo, Radica Mahase, Keith Laurence, Kusha Haraksingh, Judith Weiler, Clem Seecharan, Lomarsh Roopnarine, Basdeo Mangru, Madhavi Kale, Verene Shepherd, Dwarka Nath and Ron Ramdin have studied Indian indentured experience primarily in the former British Caribbean while Maurits Hassankhan, Rosemarjn Hoefte, Peiter Emmer and Ernest Moutoussamy have studied Indian indenture in Suriname and in the French Caribbean respectively. Except for Kumar Sircar (1971) and Lomarsh Roopnarine's (2009, 2010) studies, Indian indenture in the Danish West Indies has not received any meaningful attention. The overall insular or regional Indocentric approach and attention is largely a result of the legacy of colonialism and language differences (Creole included) instituted by the various western imperial regimes in the Caribbean region before and during indenture. Except for rare cases, western European governments (British, French, Dutch and Danish) recorded indenture in their own national language. Unfortunately, since colonial times, there has been little effort to address language insularity in the Caribbean. The end result is that while language barriers permeate almost every academic area and stage in the Caribbean, including the study of Indian indenture, there have been in the past decades a surge of studies on comparative historical analysis around the world (see Mahoney 2004). The application of a comparative historical analysis is important to the study of Indian Caribbean indenture for two broad reasons. First, it can provide a more rounded view of indenture and perhaps erase the current notion that the entire indenture system was essentially a uniform experience. Second, it also can help to reconnect, resuscitate and restore events and images of the overall Caribbean indentured diasporic experience, which has been suppressed and subdued by insularity. To this day, descendants of indentured Indians have little knowledge of each other in the Caribbean despite an array of studies, conferences, and religious community connections.

The following article analyzes two failed indenture experiences in the early post-emancipation Caribbean: British Guiana (1838-1843) and Danish St. Croix (1863-1868). Both failed experiments lasted for five years and were the first indentured experiments in both colonies, twentyfive years apart, after slave emancipation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparative Analysis of Two Failed Indenture Experiences in Post-Emancipation Caribbean: British Guiana (1838-1843) and Danish St. Croix (1863-1868)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.