Meaningful Spectacles: Gothic Ivories Staging the Divine

By Guérin, Sarah M. | The Art Bulletin, March 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Meaningful Spectacles: Gothic Ivories Staging the Divine

Guérin, Sarah M., The Art Bulletin

The history of metheval art in the West is that of a struggle to transform into meaningful spectacle the spiritual impoverishment of visible things that had been delegated to a "second order" of signification. - Michael Camille, Gothic Idol, 19891

In The Sense of Order, Ernst Gombrich recounted a conversation he had with Erwin Panofsky in Cape Cod while they were walking Panofsky's dog Jerry in the summer of 1951:

He [Panofsky] told me how puzzled he had been in his student days by the expression "Godiic painting." He could understand the application to buildings or decoration, but in what sense could a painting be Godiic? I summoned my courage and asked "Do you think that all this really exists?," to which he replied with an uncompromising "yes." Only later I realized that in his lectures on Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism he had just committed himself to another attempt to justify the Hegelian tradition of governing spirits.2

Gombrich, citing this anecdote in the midst of a discussion of the diorny issue of Hegelian Zeitgeist, proceeds to take up the question Panofsky posed and to examine whetiier "there exists a link between a painting and its frame, or more specifically between all the elements of a Godiic altar, the shrine with its sculptures, the wings with their reliefs and the painted panels and the architectural detail of its fretwork setting." Gombrich's solution for complex objects like the late fifteendi-century High Altar of Blaubeuren Klosterkirch is a type of guilt by association: we the twentiedi- and twentyfirst-century art historians are so attuned to seeing late metheval paintings within Godiic frames that "Godiicness" is transferred to the painting or sculpture, itself devoid of such characteristic features as pointed arches, flying buttresses, or rib vaults. If the only quality these objects share is their spatial proximity, Gombrich avoids the uncomfortable ideological ground of having either frame or sculpture participate in an undefined and mystical Spirit of the Age. The paintings are, for Gombrich, Godiic merely by virtue of their habitual arrangement and our built-up expectations, and not the result of an "organic unity" of a period style.3

A version of Panofsky's question diat summer day in Cape Cod leads to an examination of the rationale behind the pervasive use of microarchitectural forms on ivory carvings from the diirteendi century. Just before recounting his discussion with Panofsky, Gombrich had enumerated ivory diptychs as among the types of objects passively adorned with the fashionable architectural ornaments of the day.4 That such objects today are habitually called "Godiic ivories" seems self-evident: the material of elephant ivory and the miniature architectural frames are taken as their defining features (Fig. 1). Yet if we avoid treating the marriage of ivory and microarchitecture as axiomatic, we find the choice behind this union of material and ornamental form not only sheds light on the use of microarchitecture as a prevalent artistic choice in the diirteendi century but also demonstrates a visual response to a pressing intellectual and societal concern. In refusing to probe more deeply for fear of discovering Hegelian roots, Gombrich misunderstood Panofsky's thesis and brushed aside an instructive question for the understanding of a widespread phenomenon in the Godiic period: the use of microarchitectural frames.5

In Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism (1951), Panofsky had tried valiandy to redefine an age's unifying aestiietic tendency, its style, by replacing Zeitgeist with habitus, or habit of mind.6 In the text's introduction, Panofsky speaks about indefinable "parallelisms" between intellectual trends and artistic forms, but these generalizations too are set aside in favor of a more concrete assessment of a specific time and place where philosophers and masons coexisted in close proximity and, he argues, intermingled. Panofsky's thesis was diat the Scholastic intellectual formation shaped a mental habit diat generated what we know as Godiic architecture.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Meaningful Spectacles: Gothic Ivories Staging the Divine


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?