Human Life Is Not Sheep: An Ethical Perspective on Cloning

By Scorgie, Glen C.; Jones, Claire F. Evans | Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, December 1997 | Go to article overview

Human Life Is Not Sheep: An Ethical Perspective on Cloning


Scorgie, Glen C., Jones, Claire F. Evans, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society


GLEN G. SCORGIE AND CLAIRE F. EVANS JONES*

On February 22, 1997, the media were abuzz with the announcement that Scottish geneticists had-eight months earlier-successfully cloned (copied) a sheep named Dolly.1 Quite understandably the Scottish achievement of sheep-cloning was treated as a newsworthy milestone in the smoothly speeding advance of modern biotechnology. Not since the advent in the late 1970s of Louise Brown, the celebrated first test-tube baby, has public attention been so focused on the biological revolution under way in our time. 2

The thing that made Dolly loom so large, of course, was that she signaled the imminent feasibility of applying comparable procedures and technology to the cloning of human beings. And this prospect has sent everyone scrambling. Arthur L. Caplan admits that unfortunately "we don't have the legal and ethical basis to handle [these rapid developments] yet."3

Prudence urges that we ought to proceed slowly on a matter of such potentially great import. Consequently the United Nations, Bill Clinton and others have issued cautious statements that are essentially designed to buy some time and carve out some breathing space to weigh the implications of this new capability for shaping humanity. This article is an attempt to take advantage of this breathing space to reflect on the ethical aspects of cloning from a Christian perspective.

Admittedly there is a cozy, parochial flavor to the topic, for cloning has emerged as an issue for serious consideration only in the relatively affluent and technologically advanced nations of the world. From a global perspective there is something embarrassing about dealing with something so unreal to the great majority of human beings in their gritty struggle merely to survive. A sense of moral proportion would suggest that other less esoteric issues have a greater claim upon our attention. In our own proscribed context, however, we must reluctantly acknowledge that the issue of cloning has surfaced and therefore cannot safely be ignored.

By the nature of its discussion this article belongs to the sprawling field of bioethics and, more precisely, to its subdivision of genetic ethics. Even so it will not address genetic therapies or touch on the ominous issues associated with recombinant DNA (fusing genetic material into new combinations). Indeed it considers just one, and that a relatively small, aspect of genetic engineering-namely, the cloning of human beings.

Our thesis is that Christian concern regarding human cloning need not be rooted in doubts about whether cloned persons will be fully human. Neither should Christians argue that such an arena of genetic engineering ought to be permanently and artificially cordoned off from human initiative on the grounds that any such human interventions would amount to playing God. Rather, Christians ought to encourage a moratorium on human cloning because there do not appear to be, at least at present, any motives or reasons for cloning that accord well with the divine design for human existence.4

I. THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF CLONING

Biomedical research is perhaps the most dynamic and strategic sphere of scientific advance today. It explores a pulsating microuniverse no less wondrous than the macrouniverse of space and astronomy, and from it are issuing new and unprecedented capabilities to inaugurate human life, to affect its quality and alter its contours, and then, as each life draws inexorably to a close, to determine its duration and set the moment of its termination. The whole intent of such research applications is to become more involved and benevolently intentional in matters of creating and sustaining life and thus not to leave so much to chance.

Bioethics, or medical ethics, is a burgeoning field. Ethicists who hope to stay abreast of the myriad of new issues and dilemmas raised by these developments are, among other things, obliged to familiarize themselves with an ever-expanding glossary of strange new terms. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Human Life Is Not Sheep: An Ethical Perspective on Cloning
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.