After the Glass Has Shattered: A Comparative Analysis of Orthodox Jewish Divorce in the United States and Israel

By Capell, Heather Lynn | Texas International Law Journal, Spring 1998 | Go to article overview

After the Glass Has Shattered: A Comparative Analysis of Orthodox Jewish Divorce in the United States and Israel


Capell, Heather Lynn, Texas International Law Journal


SHATTERED GLASS

The kalah' and chatan2 stand under the chupah.3 The chazan4 chants the Seven Blessings. The rings have been exchanged, the ketubah5 has been read and signed, and then, in the midst of the happiness, the chatan smashes a wineglass wrapped in cloth with his foot. Shattered, the glass lies on the floor. "Mazel Tov!"6 shouts the crowd. The Jewish marriage ritual is complete.7

The shattered glass symbolizes and reminds the couple and all of those in attendance of the many tears shed throughout the history of the Jewish people. The shattered glass symbolizes and reminds them of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. This symbol and reminder serves to humble the couple as they begin their new life together, united as one.8 Unfortunately, for some the shattered glass foreshadows the fate of their union. For these few, the marriage will end tragically with a decision by one or both parties to divorce. For Jewish couples, this decision dictates that the divorce must be conducted under Jewish laws.

This paper will compare Orthodox Jewish divorce in two democratic legal systems: the secular family law of the United States and the religious family law of Israel. The analysis will trace the development of the law in both countries. This will include case analysis in both countries. Furthermore, this paper will examine these cases' different and similar impacts on the legal and social system in each country. The emphasis of change can be detected in newly created statutes as interpreted by the secular courts in the United States. The changes in the Israeli system are revealed in the increased jurisdiction of the secular courts over marital matters, at the expense of the religious courts. In both countries, however, there is a push toward using secular sanctions initiated by civil courts to compel citizens to subject themselves to the jurisdiction of the religious courts.

II. THE TWO LEGAL SYSTEMS

Both the United States and Israel are considered democracies. Both countries have established legal systems in which there are legislatures, courts, judges, and citizens. Each country, however, divides their legal scope of influence very differently from one another.

A. The US. Legal System and Family Law

The relevant parts of the U.S. family law system are the federal and state courts and legislatures. In the United States, marriage and divorce law are the subject of state statutes. Between 1969 and 1985, there was a fervent movement in the United States to reform the divorce laws from strict fault-based laws, which had been founded upon canon law, to more lenient types of no-fault or mixed-fault divorce statutes.9 Moreover, today's laws include the "acceptance or simplification of divorce by mutual consent."'o Divorce law in the United States is a civil matter, in which the laws develop through majority mandates from the legislatures" and through judicial decisions in state and federal courts interpreting the new and old statutes.12 U.S. courts have even gone as far as to suggest that the right to divorce is a constitutional right.l3

B. The Israeli Legal System and Family Law

Israel's legal system is founded upon principles influenced by traditional Jewish law and the success and structure of positive state law. This combination "is a source of substantive and procedural legal problems and of tensions in public life generally."'4 As a result of this tension, Israel does not have a written constitution.15 Instead, Israel has eleven Basic Laws which outline the existing practices and symbols of the State.'6 Israel has a loosely coordinated set of court systems: the civil courts, the military courts, and the courts of the fourteen recognized religious communities. Within Israel the civil courts have basic jurisdiction in criminal and civil matters.... The various religious courts have exclusive jurisdiction over members of their communities on matters relating to marriage and divorce; there is no civil marriage or divorce in Israel. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

After the Glass Has Shattered: A Comparative Analysis of Orthodox Jewish Divorce in the United States and Israel
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.