'A Plural Thing': Inventing a Feminist Brain-Based Subject of Law

By O'Connell, Karen | The Australian Feminist Law Journal, December 2012 | Go to article overview

'A Plural Thing': Inventing a Feminist Brain-Based Subject of Law


O'Connell, Karen, The Australian Feminist Law Journal


Abstract.

A brain-based subject of law is emerging, in which neurological processes become a primary means of defining individual choice, behaviour, capacity and responsibility. This paper considers the impact of such a shift in legal subjectivity on feminist engagement with law. A reductionist take on the brain works to entrench narrow readings of law and discourage feminist reforms. However, emerging neurotechnologies such as brain scanning and neuropharmacology also have disruptive qualities that might be harnessed in the interests of feminist legal inventions and interventions. This paper looks to the disruptive aspects of neurotechnologies to argue for an alternative brain-based subjectivity in law, one that sees the brain as 'open': an organ that connects us to others, that is embedded in relationships and situated in a particular history and politics. Such an approach makes visible the gendered underpinnings of 'neurolaw' and allows for a brain-based legal subject that is open to feminist creativity.

This is an open moment: although the outcome is far from clear, it is apparent that the brain is a plural thing, culturally speaking.1

1.0 LAW, GENDER AND THE BRAIN

Neuroscience is increasingly impacting on contemporary life, with brain-based research filtering into new and unexpected social and cultural domains.2 Philosophers and scientists, as well as lawyers, have argued that neuroscience is poised to change the way that we make and apply law, specifically through a brain-based understanding of the legal subject. Whether legal subjects are lying, whether they have committed a crime, whether they can be held responsible for their actions, whether they have capacity to testify - these areas of law and many others are claimed as potentially transformed by neuroscience.3 In this construct, the brain becomes a proxy for selfhood. How a brain appears to function, as measured by a range of scans and other technological interventions, stands in as a truer test of who we are than our own account, since a scanner bypasses the possibly deceptive or self-deceptive speaking agent in favour of a seemingly more reliable scientific rendering of selfhood.

For a feminist, the claims of an emerging brain-based legal subject are both worrying and promising. There are signs that the brain-based materials on which law may draw are gendered in potentially negative ways that are rendered invisible by the scientific language in which they are couched.4 There are also resonances between the reductionist qualities of the brain-based subject and the traditional limitations of law that feminists have been struggling against for decades. Yet there is also the promise that opening up new areas of subjectivity will allow for feminist incursions into law. How will a brain-based subject impact on feminist efforts to make space for women's disadvantage to be recognised in law? To get women's experiences inside law, to have them afforded legal protection, feminists need to be constandy pushing against or disrupting the boundaries of law. In this article I consider two feminist approaches to transforming law and legal selfhood: stretching and invention, with reference to how feminists have attempted to change legal responses to women's disadvantage. I argue that emerging neurotechnologies such as brain scanning and neuropharmacology provide two essential elements that allow for feminist legal invention: disrupting traditional definitional boundaries and making visible aspects of identity that are otherwise invisible in law. I describe a brain-based subject of law that is open to feminist invention.

2.0 THE EMERGING BRAIN-BASED SUBJECT OF LAW

As neuroscientific developments begin to pervade public life they are transforming social institutions and the way that identity is lived and understood. The intensification of brain scanning research, and the public presentation of this research as a source of unique insights into aspects of human identity, has fed an increasing biologisation of selfhood. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

'A Plural Thing': Inventing a Feminist Brain-Based Subject of Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.