The International Human Rights Movement: A History

By Doughty, Howard A. | The Innovation Journal, September 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

The International Human Rights Movement: A History


Doughty, Howard A., The Innovation Journal


Aryeh Neier The International Human Rights Movement: A History Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012

Reviewed by Howard A. Doughty

Each morning, after I've consumed my quota of coffee and browsed through the comforting paper-and-ink version of the local newspaper, I attend to the collection of electronic journals and related matter that has amassed overnight in my computer's inbox. There I find The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian and about a dozen "alternative" Internet-based news and public affairs websites. In the mix are notices from another dozen advocacy groups urging me to sign a petition, make a donation or merely learn about an alleged calumny on the part of the authorities or an impending disaster (animal, vegetable, mineral or meteorological-any or all of which have been ignored, marginalized or rationalized by the mainstream print and broadcast media. Among these groups are Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International (AI), which are probably the most easily identified and influential non-governmental organizations engaged in the promotion of human rights or, more often, the struggle against violations of human rights. They operate world-wide and subject offending nations (which are almost all of them) to critical scrutiny. The stories they tell are compelling. The issues they raise are often awkward and sometimes embarrassing (especially to the leaders of liberal democracies who prefer to believe that human rights abuses occur somewhere else). They are also tricky because they rely on a fundamental concept that is ill-defined, philosophically problematic and practically difficult to assess and address.

Human rights are strange conceptual beasts. There is, for example, no consensus on what they are. Some people think that they are absolute moral imperatives; some think that they are procedural norms related more to "fairness" in process than to "justice" in outcomes; some think that they are legal or political fictions ("conceits of the human imagination," which does deny that they are important, useful and valuable); and some say that they are nothing more than rhetorical tropes deployed to justify disputes over the exercise of political power. There is also no consensus on where they come from: some people insist that they are divinely ordained; some think they are the product of natural law; some say that they are social constructions that are culturally relative, historically contingent and endlessly negotiable (we just make them up ourselves); and, others, of course, deny that they even exist as meaningful objects of rational discussion.

Of practical importance are certain obvious and highly disputed issues. If, for example, we accept the existence and agree on at least a basic list of human rights, how are we to define their limits-if any? Does my right to free speech entail my ability to make libelous statements, to employ what is now fashionably known as "hate speech" or, emblematically, to call out "Fire!" in a crowded theatre (unless I detect smoke and flames and reasonably conclude that the audience is in immediate peril)? Are these rights to be construed as "universal," so that local populations lose the "right" (so to speak) to determine which rights should apply in their community? Is there a right to opt out of someone else's charter of rights and to voluntarily surrender certain rights if they do not win the consent of a particular society or group within a society? How, in addition, are we to resolve matters when two sorts of rights seem to be in conflict? So, the right to practice this or that religion is sometimes viewed as a means to deny some people the rights normally given to others: the example of women's rights in certain versions of Christianity and Islam immediately comes to mind.

How to explain, how to define, how to apply and how to prioritize rights are questions with which philosophers, political theorists and politicians have struggled at least since Thomas Hobbes spoke of unlimited rights (and unlimited risk) in "the state of nature. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The International Human Rights Movement: A History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.