The Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists

By Doris, David T. | The Art Bulletin, June 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists


Doris, David T., The Art Bulletin


MARY JANE JACOB AND MICHELLE GRABNER, EDS. The Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. 328 pp.; 69 b/w ills. $73.00; $35.00 (paper); $7.00-$21.00 (e-book)

In "The Function of the Studio" (1971), conceptual artist Daniel Buren defined the artist's studio in terms of "frames, envelopes, and limits," limits that he, as a standard-bearer of institutional critique, saw as stifling and untenable. For Buren, this privileged space of artistic production had become nothing more than an "ossifying custom." He aimed to demystify the studio by calling it a "commercial depot" for curators and dealers and then render it irrelevant through his commitment to site-specific art. Once a work leaves the studio to be installed in a museum or gallery, Buren argued, its meaning is irrevocably compromised and "neutralized to the extreme." Unmoored from its site of inspiration and creation, it loses its intentionality and connection to its conditions of production. Unless artists have the authority to demand their work be preserved in their studios in perpetuity, like Constantin Brancusi (a hero of Buren's), dien it is better to shutter the studio and shift all art making outside its walls (pp. 156-62).

The model of the studio Buren critiques is a modern one, and its tropological features were articulated 140 years earlier in Honoré de Balzac's tale of artistic genius and failure, The Unknown Masterpiece ( 1831 ).' Balzac's image of the atelier is a cramped, cluttered, and sky-lit space - the dusty lair of a solitary male painter whose bric-a-brac emanates an aura of mystery and genius. The story ends with the master painter Frenhofer in a state of total despair, having just realized - through the eyes of his visitors, - that his painting is illegible. The result of ten years of struggle, his depiction of a beautiful woman has amounted to "Nothing, nothing!" - a formless "wall of paint."2 Balzac dramatizes a central dilemma of the studio as a mental and physical space, where art emerges from a fusion of immaterial concept and material craft: Is genius to be found in the object, or is it located in the artist's mind? If the former, does the work lose its luster outside the studio, without the trappings of genius? If the latter, how do viewers appreciate conceptual brilliance without, as Buren writes, "visible evidence . . . that allows an understanding of process"? How do they know whether Frenhofer's woman or Buren's stripes are not a scam?

Balzac's and Buren's views of the studio are typically seen as diametrically opposed, with Buren as the disillusioned, clearsighted critic of Balzac's myth, but they actually share a good deal of common ground. Frenhofer's "wall of paint" metaphorizes the studio as a space of oppressive limits and delusions, presaging Buren's essay; and although Buren "distrusts" the studio as an auratic and idealizing space, he nonetheless attributes to it an "energy essential to [art's] existence." Like Balzac, he has affection for the "clutter" of studio space, and he waxes nostalgic when recalling his first studio visits as a young man. Disillusion over what happens when art leaves the studio grounds his critique, suggesting that the problem lies not in the studio but in everything else: the institutions that prey on it (pp. 160-61).

Buren's essay serves as a strange centerpiece for The Studio Reader, an anthology of texts whose stated purpose is "to revisit the studio and resituate it in contemporary times"(p. xii). "The Function of the Studio" falls roughly in the middle of the book, and its critical proposals are paraphrased (and sometimes directly cited) throughout. But Buren 's call to leave the studio is often distorted as more antistudio than it was. The anthology's other primary purpose is to "confront the myths" surrounding the studio (p. xiii), and to this end a passage from The Unknown Masterpiece serves as the epigraph to the introducüon. This introduction presents Balzac's model as a romande fantasy ripe for debunking, but many of the contributors to The Studio Reader, sometimes writing under the veil of critique, perpetuate myths of the studio instead.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?