Canadian Immigration and the North Atlantic Trading Company 1899-1906: A Controversy Revisited

By Petryshyn, Jaroslav | Journal of Canadian Studies, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Canadian Immigration and the North Atlantic Trading Company 1899-1906: A Controversy Revisited


Petryshyn, Jaroslav, Journal of Canadian Studies


Although Canadian immigration history (1896-1914) has been intensively studied and well documented, at least one aspect remains to be clarified -- the role and significance of the North Atlantic Trading Company (NATC). In 1899, Clifford Sifton sanctioned a controversial contract with the NATC whereby the Company acquired a monopoly on all Canadian immigration promotional work throughout continental Europe and Scandinavia. While the Laurier administration maintained that the NATC was a legitimate organization which gave good value for the money spent, critics of the government charged that the NATC was a fraud, taking large sums of public funds for services not rendered. The purpose of this paper is to examine the origins and activities of the NATC and to ascertain whether it was an effective agency for procuring immigrants or an elaborate fraud perpetrated by corrupt officials.

Under the astute direction of Clifford Sifton, Minister of the Department of the Interior (1896-1906), the Laurier administration embarked upon an enormous campaign to secure immigrants for settlement and development of the North West. The results were highly successful: thousands of agriculturists from various nations of the world poured onto the Canadian prairies. This segment in Canada's immigration history has been intensively studied and well documented; however, at least one aspect remains to be clarified -- the activities of the North Atlantic Trading Company (NATC).

In 1899 Sifton sanctioned a long-term contract with the NATC whereby the company acquired a monopoly on all Canadian immigration promotional work through continental Europe and Scandinavia. The company received large sums of money by way of bonuses paid on immigrants landing in Canadian ports. Two government officials were the chief architects of the deal -- W. TR. Preston, Commissioner of Emigration and James A. Smart, Deputy Minister of the Interior. Preston initiated the negotiations and consummated the contract while Smart orchestrated its acceptance in the Department of the Interior. Both men insisted that the agreement be kept secret from the Canadian public and Parliament.

When the government-NATC arrangement finally became public in 1905, a rancorous debate ensued in the House of Commons. Detractors believed the NATC to be a fraud, "raking-off" government funds for services not rendered. As well, they accused Preston and Smart of conspiring to make substantial personal profits as close associates of the NATC while acting as government representatives.

These allegations led to an investigation of the whole matter by two parliamentary committees -- the Select Standing Committee on Agriculture and Colonization (A & C) and the Select Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PA). Yet, after hundreds of pages of testimony from dozens of witnesses the central question remained unresolved. Was the NATC a legitimate organization that carried out its obligations diligently, diverting thousands of immigrants to Canada who otherwise would have gone to the United States or South America, or was it another instance of corruption and fraud perpetrated in the highest levels of the government bureaucracy?

To date, most of the secondary literature has been favourable to the NATC. John Dafoe, in his laudatory Clifford Sifton In Relations To His Times, propagated the view that the NATC was a respectable organization instrumental in procuring for Canada "discriminating" immigrants from Europe and Scandinavia, and that the "scandal campaign" against the government and its contract with the Company was the result of partisan politics which, in retrospect, would prove groundless.' Dafoe took Lauder, Sifton, Preston and Smart at their word, and so have subsequent historians. For example, while allowing that the NATC "... raised the suspicions of graft and misappropriation. ..." Mabel Timlin concludes in her 1960 article that "there is nothing in the Sifton or Lauder Papers to justify such suspicions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Canadian Immigration and the North Atlantic Trading Company 1899-1906: A Controversy Revisited
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?