Equitable Access: Examining Information Asymmetry in Reverse Redlining Claims through Critical Race Theory

By Falck, Charles | Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Equitable Access: Examining Information Asymmetry in Reverse Redlining Claims through Critical Race Theory


Falck, Charles, Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights


I. Introduction 101

II. Reverse-Redlining Claims 103

A. Evidence that Minority Borrowers Suffered More, the Fair Housing Act, and Reverse-Redlining Plaintiffs 103

B. Varying Tests Adopted for Stating a Reverse-Redlining Claim 105

C. Recommendations for Judges Deciding Reverse-Redlining Claims 109

III. Supporting the New Standard Through Critical Race Theory Ill

A. The Subprime Mortgage Collapse, Critical Race Theory, and Neoclassical Economics 111

B. Efficiency: Discrimination, Informational Asymmetry, and the Neoclassical "Rational Actor" 113

C. Judges as Actors for Combating Information Asymmetry.118

IV. Conclusion 118

I. Introduction

The economic collapse of 2008 affected an extraordinary number of Americans.1 The implosion of the mortgage-backed securities market, which accelerated the recession, was rooted in the American subprime loan market. Lending institutions made high-priced, dangerous loans to individuals whose credit profiles and incomes indicated that they were likely to default. As defaults mounted and housing prices fell, the worth of the complex financial instruments plummeted, as did the Wall Street institutions that used the instruments to leverage themselves with debt many times greater than their operating capital. The financial crisis exposed Wall Street as a house of cards, and much of the regulatory conversation in the years since has focused on preventing Wall Street institutions from so cavalierly mishandling the vast amounts of money the public entrusts to them.2 Yet while chief executives and financial officers face closer scrutiny in the eyes of the law and public opinion, a graver reality confronts the borrowers who signed mortgages they were unlikely to ever pay off.

Some of these borrowers have turned to courts for redress. As a theoretical matter, these lawsuits straddle a precarious line: though the terms of these mortgages were unfavorable, could the borrowers seek compensation despite willingly accepting these unfavorable terms? Part II of this Note focuses on lawsuits alleging that banks engaged in predatory lending-that is, offering subprime loans to individuals who either could have qualified for a fairly administered loan or who should not have qualified for any loan. Plaintiffs have brought claims of this nature under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), the Truth in Lending Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. This Note will focus on claims alleged under the FHA.

The author will argue that courts should adopt a test for stating a prima facie claim of reverse redlining that does not penalize plaintiffs disadvantaged by information asymmetry. The tests used by courts have, to an extent, depended upon the plaintiffs showing the unfairness and discrimination in their loan terms by examining the loan terms of non-minority borrowers, even though such terms are quite complex and rarely available. Consequently, plaintiffs have to obtain, interpret, and explain loan terms that lenders have created, organized, and have easier access to.

In order to alleviate the information asymmetry, judges should first utilize a test for stating a reverse-redlining claim that allows plaintiffs, whenever possible, to make out a prima facie case by producing information from their own records or publicly available sources. Second, where statistical analysis of documents not belonging to plaintiffs is required, judges should clearly identify which statistics could be used to make out a prima facie claim.

In Part III, the Note will explore its thesis from Part II through critical race theory and neoclassical economics. The counter-arguments utilize notions of efficiency and rationality within the housing market, both before and after the 2008 crisis. In response, the Note will criticize several assumptions underlying the neoclassical approach, focusing on the realities disadvantaged minority plaintiffs face and detail attributes that make courts well suited to serve as institutions for reform. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Equitable Access: Examining Information Asymmetry in Reverse Redlining Claims through Critical Race Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.