Hola Preemption and the Original Intent of Congress: Are Federal Thrifts Necessary to Stabilize the Housing Market?

By Chatman, Carliss N. | Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, July 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

Hola Preemption and the Original Intent of Congress: Are Federal Thrifts Necessary to Stabilize the Housing Market?


Chatman, Carliss N., Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law


ABSTRACT

This article studies legislation, regulations, and case law to analyze whether the Homeowners Loan Act, as well as other measures taken to stabilize federal thrifts in the last forty years, have served their original purpose. It also examines the impact of federal intervention on states and homeowners and the role that federally-chartered institutions such as banks and savings and loan associations played in the 2008 market collapse. Over the course of this analysis, particular attention is given to Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This act has numerous goals including implementing stronger consumer protections, restoring state rights, and preventing another financial crisis, thereby avoiding the need for government funded recovery. It is clear that federal regulators overstepped their bounds in order to preserve federal thrifts, infringed on the rights of states, and limited homeowner access to justice-all in the name of promoting market stability. The evidence proves that federal intervention worsened the impact of the crisis. This article concludes that federal thrifts no longer serve their original purpose and are no longer economically viable without preferential treatment from the federal government. Since states are in the best position to protect homeowners and institutions do not need an incentive to engage in residential lending, it is in the best interest of all parties to eliminate the federal thrift charter.

Introduction

In response to the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression,1 Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank," "Dodd-Frank Act").2 Federal institutions played a significant role in causing this crisis, specifically the housing market collapse, by using preemption to block state efforts at addressing the financial meltdown.3 Dodd-Frank repealed the regulations mandating field preemption and eliminated the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), instead bringing the regulation of thrifts under the control of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC").4 The Act also created the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection ("CFPB" or "Bureau").5

In the 1930s, Congress enacted the Home Owners' Loan Act ("HOLA")6 and created the federal thrift charter.7 Congress considered federal intervention necessary to the country's recovery, and intended for these actions to stimulate the economy and provide a resource for home financing.8 Recently, HOLA has been the basis for removing cases brought by homeowners from state to federal court due to field preemption.9 After removal many homeowners' claims are dismissed due to the lack of a comparable federal remedy, caused in part by the failure of the OTS to adopt consumer protection laws.10 Congress' original intent was to create more sources for loans, not to usurp state power and restrict homeowner access to the courts." Dodd-Frank makes some effort to undo the impact of the OTS power grab by subjecting OCC regulations to conflict preemption. Unfortunately, to date, courts have not applied conflict preemption and have instead relied on the fact that the Act does not apply retroactively to completely disregard the reforms.12

In theory, the authority vested in the CFPB should create a system of dual regulation, thereby returning power to the states while creating a parallel system of federal measures.13 However, it remains to be seen whether the CFPB can operate to prevent the harm to homeowners caused by federal thrifts.14 The CFPB's creation was subject to extensive debate and its current operation is controversial.15 If DoddFrank's changes are not implemented and the CFPB is abolished or its activities limited in the name of partisan politics, homeowners and state economies will suffer while banks benefit from the same relaxed and confusing regulatory environment that contributed to the crisis.

This article addresses a number of issues including: the need for federal savings and loans in the context of the original purpose of federal thrifts; the nature of our system of government; the regulatory failures of the last decade; and Dodd-Frank's controversial attempts to provide a federal solution. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Hola Preemption and the Original Intent of Congress: Are Federal Thrifts Necessary to Stabilize the Housing Market?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.