In the Name of Custom, Culture, and the Constitution: Korean Customary Law in Flux

By Kim, Marie Seong-Hak | Texas International Law Journal, Summer 2013 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

In the Name of Custom, Culture, and the Constitution: Korean Customary Law in Flux


Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, Texas International Law Journal


Summary

Introduction 357

I. Jurisprudence of Custom 363

A. Concepts of Customary Law 363

B. Custom and Reason 366

C. Confucian Culture and Constitutional Challenges 368

II. Bordering Tradition and Legislation: Custom-Based Statutes .372

A. Ancestor Memorial Service and Ritual Property 374

B. Constitutional Reckoning 376

C. What's in a Name? That Which We Call Reason 380

III. Custom that Confounds: Gravesite Superficies 383

A. Superficies in Korean Law 383

B. Customary Law of Gravesite Superficies 385

Conclusion 389

INTRODUCTION

The Korean Civil Code of 1960, the first Korean code after independence from Japanese colonial rule, recognizes customary law and reason (chori) as official sources of law.1 Article 1 provides: "In civil matters, if there is no applicable provision in Statutes, customary law shall apply, and if there is no applicable customary law, sound reasoning shall apply."2 It is the same language that is found in the Chinese Civil Code of 1929-30 (currently in force in Taiwan) and the Civil Code of 1937 of the now-defunct Manchukuo.1 This provision has been viewed as deriving from the famous Article 1 of the Swiss Civil Code, which provides: "In the absence of a provision, the court shall decide in accordance with customary law and, in the absence of customary law, in accordance with the rule that it would make as legislator. In doing so, the court shall follow established doctrine and case law."4 The Swiss Code of 1907 served as the prototype for a number of civil codes around the world including East Asia; its clearly defined hierarchy of legal sources, in particular, profoundly inspired many legislators.5 But the direct origin of the aforementioned provision in the East Asian codes was an article in a Japanese law, issued over thirty years earlier than the Swiss Civil Code.6

In June 1875, the Great Council of State (Dajökan) of the Meiji government in Japan promulgated the Rules for the Conduct of Judicial Affairs (Law No. 103).7 Its Article 3 provided the precise language that was later duplicated in other East Asian laws, that is, written law, customary law, and reason (jöri) were sources of law.8 The 1875 law represented an early milestone in the process of the reception of European law into Japan. It is important to note that one of the first subjects of legal reception was the concept of customary law.9 Custom as a source of law did not exist in pre-modern East Asia.1" Traditional China and Korea, as well as Japan before the onset of feudalism in the twelfth century, each had a highly advanced and comprehensive codified legal system." These states' codes were replete with elaborate penal proscriptions and administrative regulations, but the notion of private law as judicially enforceable norms that govern relations among individuals was largely absent.12 This was one of the fundamental differences from the Western legal tradition in which law was primarily a system of civil law rules enforced through adjudication.

Before the codification of the modern Civil Code in Meiji Japan, express provisions of law were few and proved inadequate to deal with mounting civil disputes. The 1875 law declaring custom to be a source of law provided an important respite to this situation by allowing judges considerable latitude in deciding cases." Because Japan did not have a written collection or a codified body of customary law, it was far from clear what custom was.14 Japanese legislators and scholars were notoriously oblivious of the distinction between custom and conventional usages and tended to regard all indigenous practices as well as the Tokugawa bakufu government's laws as custom.15 In the name of applying legal custom, under the 1875 law, Meiji judges evaluated old customs and practices and selectively applied what they regarded as reasonable custom; in the name of reason and justice, they applied general principles drawn from imported European law, in particular the French Civil Code.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

In the Name of Custom, Culture, and the Constitution: Korean Customary Law in Flux
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?