Washington's Electronic Signature Act: An Anachronism in the New Millennium

By Curry, Stephanie | Washington Law Review, June 2013 | Go to article overview

Washington's Electronic Signature Act: An Anachronism in the New Millennium


Curry, Stephanie, Washington Law Review


Abstract: Today, electronic contracting is at the forefront of how consumers, governments, and businesses conduct their affairs. Over the last several decades, electronic contracting has taken on new forms that have raised doubts about contract formation and enforceability. In order to facilitate commerce, the federal government and forty-nine states have responded by passing legislation that gives broad legal recognition to electronic signatures. Washington State is currently the only state that has not updated its electronic signature statute to comport with modern technology and ways of doing business. As a result, Washington's Electronic Authentication Act is likely preempted by federal law, and it presents an uncertain environment for electronic contracting. This Comment argues that Washington should join the overwhelming majority of states in adopting the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act to optimize its statutory framework for facilitating electronic contracting.

INTRODUCTION

Unique like a thumbprint, pen-and-paper signatures have historically been essential to creating binding legal documents and commercial transactions.1 Today, the forms that modern signatures take would be unrecognizable to our great-grandparents' generation. The modern pledge may now be made by sending an email, clicking a button on a website, or using sophisticated asymmetric cryptography technology, among others.2

Congress and state legislatures have tried to keep pace with this technology in order to create parity between electronic and pen-andpaper signatures.3 Around the mid-1990s, states began adopting laws giving legal recognition to various forms of electronic signatures.4 States like Utah5 and Washington6 only narrowly recognized "digital signatures" that followed specific security protocols to confirm a signer's identity.7 Other states took a broader approach and gave legal recognition to any type of electronic signature.8 In response to this patchwork of state laws, the Uniform Law Commission issued a model state law in 1999, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA),9 which broadly recognized all kinds of electronic signatures.10

Despite the promulgation of UETA, the federal government feared that states would be slow to adopt UETA, and it sought to speed the adoption of a uniform, nationwide law.11 In 2000, Congress passed the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN),12 which gives broad legal recognition to electronic signatures13 and governs all interstate and international electronic transactions.14 While ESIGN borrowed similar concepts and provisions from UETA, the two are not identical.15 For example, ESIGN adds heightened consumer consent requirements,16 but it lacks other guidelines found in UETA, such as provisions regarding attribution disputes.17 In light of these similarities and differences, Congress added a unique preemption provision to ESIGN: a state that enacts the official version of UETA is exempt from federal preemption under ESIGN; a state that enacts anything other than the official version of UETA is preempted to the extent that the law either conflicts with ESIGN or prefers certain technologies over others.18

To date, all states have enacted UETA except for Illinois, New York, and Washington.19 Washington's law was originally drafted to give legal effect to digital signatures20-a subset of electronic signatures that uses specific, secure technology-and it has been amended only superficially to incorporate all types of electronic signatures.21 While Illinois22 and New York23 have laws that more closely mirror UETA and ESIGN respectively, Washington's Electronic Authentication Act (WEAA) remains a relative outlier; this outlier status creates uncertainty as to whether the statute, if challenged, would survive a preemption analysis under ESIGN. Of particular concern to UETA advocates is that Washington State-home to such e-commerce pioneers as Amazon.com, Microsoft, and Expedia-trails behind all other states in its electronic signature laws. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Washington's Electronic Signature Act: An Anachronism in the New Millennium
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.