The American Judicature Society: A Campaign for Better State Court Judges, 1913-1940

By Gleason, James A. | Judicature, May/June 2013 | Go to article overview

The American Judicature Society: A Campaign for Better State Court Judges, 1913-1940


Gleason, James A., Judicature


This article explores AJS's leadership role in efforts toward improving the quality of state court judges between 1913 and 1940. Three decades of enterprise by the American Judicature Society, aimed at improving the process for recruiting and retaining high-quality state court judges, contributed to the formulation and success of the Missouri Plan.

In November 1940, Missouri voters approved a state constitutional amendment implementing a first-of-its-kind program for the selection and retention of state court judges- the "Missouri Plan," so named in honor of its initial adopter.1 Today, some aspect of the Missouri Plan is used to select some or all judges in a majority of American states and the District of Columbia. Three decades of enterprise by the American Judicature Society (AJS), aimed at improving the process for recruiting and retaining high-quality state court judges, contributed to the formulation of the Missouri Plan, culminating in its initial electoral success.

This article explores AJS's leadership role in efforts toward improving the quality of state court judges between 1913 and 1940 as viewed through the lens of the group's primary publication. Journal of the American Judicature Society. AJS represented itself as a not-for-profit private corporation organized for the "...sole purpose of encouraging efficiency in the administration of justice."2 It served as a vital information source and sounding board for those who wished to pursue actively improvement of the American judicial system during the first half of the twentieth century, a time when such resources were largely unavailable. AJS sought to exhort and educate through the dissemination of experience and knowledge. The organization was instrumental in many of the institutional improvements of the period, especially those relating to the selection and retention of state court judges.

Foundations

The Constitution of the United States of America directs that federal judges be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate3 and shall maintain their office during good behavior while receiving undiminished compensation for their services.4 According to Alexander Hamilton, this assures "[t]he complete independence of the courts of justice," a phenomenon "peculiarly essential" to good governance; "[wjithout this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing."5 The federal approach has resulted in a staunchly independent judiciary. The situation in state courts, however, is much different. No state court judges are appointed and retained in a manner identical to the federal process, and only a few enjoy tenure during good behavior.6 The overwhelming majority of state jurists must intermittently submit to the crucible of democracy: a popular election.

Each American state has a discrete judiciary with its own institutions and history.7 Prior to 1845, every state entering the Union designated appointment of most or all of its judges.8 In contrast, every state admitted between 1846 and 1912 provided for popular election as the primary means of selecting judicial officers.9 A wave of democratization enveloped the nation in the decades prior to the Civil War, and 15 of the 29 states that existed in 1846 amended their constitutions predominantly in favor of elected judiciaries within a decade.10 The Progressive era of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, however, witnessed widespread dissatisfaction with the functioning of the American legal system and the popular election of judges became prey.

In 1906, Roscoe Pound, future dean of Harvard Law School, delivered a famous address to the annual meeting of the American Bar Association (ABA) entitled "The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice."11 He argued the judiciary failed to address modern problems like rapid population growth and the transition of the economy from agriculture to manufacturing. Pound called for an overhaul of the substantive law through both legislation and judicial empiricism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The American Judicature Society: A Campaign for Better State Court Judges, 1913-1940
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.