Brecht and the Spring Theater Season

By Neher, Erick | The Hudson Review, Summer 2013 | Go to article overview

Brecht and the Spring Theater Season


Neher, Erick, The Hudson Review


Brecht and the Spring Theater Season

When you study Modern Drama in school, a handful of names automatically populate the reading list: Ibsen, Strindberg, Chekhov, Pirandello, O'Neill, Beckett. And of course Bertolt Brecht. Few playwrights can claim as influential a legacy, let alone a name whose adjectival form is common theatrical parlance. Nevertheless, Brecht's plays have not held the stage the way his colleagues' have. New Yorkers enjoy a surfeit of revivals of modern classics, but Brecht returns only fitfully and usually unsuccessfully. It is difficult to think of a completely satisfying Brecht production in the last two decades, despite the fact that his reputation remains as strong as ever. His masterpiece, Mother Courage and Her Children, seems titanic on the page, certainly one of the four or five greatest plays of the twentieth century. It never quite plays that way on the stage, however. Even Mike Nichols and Meryl Streep failed to crack this nut in their New York Shakespeare Festival production in 2006.

Yet Brecht's work lives on, his influence too important and his art too compelling to evaporate. Coincidentally, two Brecht productions reached the New York stage last spring: The Good Person of Szechwan and The Caucasian Chalk Circle. Both are important plays from Brecht's fertile years of exile from his German homeland. After years of successful, groundbreaking work in Weimar Berlin, culminating in the epochal smash The Threepenny Opera, Brecht fled in 1933 when the Nazis came to power. Two fitful decades in Europe and the United States followed, but most of the plays that still hold the stage stem from this exile period. These works still display a deeply mysterious artistry, an almost naive poeticism that lifts them above the blunt force of Brecht's earlier work and the didactic polemics of his later plays, written after his return to East Germany in the 1950s.

Despite these important works, however, the lasting importance of Brecht probably lies more in his influential theories than in the individual play texts. Like any good Marxist, Brecht wanted to expose the means of production; he wanted the audience to be aware that they were watching a play and to take note of who put that play together and how. To achieve this goal, he continually broke the so-called "fourth wall" between the audience and the stage, using a variety of theatrical techniques. These include direct address from the actor to the audi- ence, visible lighting and other stage equipment, interpolated songs that step outside of the action, spoken stage directions, and exaggerated, non-realistic costumes and makeup. The point was to avoid the usual theatrical illusion of a unified, realistic world and instead to acknowledge the artificial, constructed nature of all theatrical work-and by extension the artificial, constructed (and therefore malleable) nature of all social and political enterprise. Brecht dubbed his practice "Epic Theater," denoting a theatrical site for political and dialectical analysis and advocacy, rather than a place for pure entertainment or reinforcement of bourgeois values. At the end of the play, he wanted his spectator to say not, "Wasn't that nice," but rather, "How do we change things for the better?" The platonically ideal Brecht audience marches out of the theater into the streets, demanding revolution and justice.

Brecht's anti-illusory theatrical techniques aimed to create the famous Verfremdungseffekt which is often translated as "Alienation Effect"-and here we encounter a central misunderstanding of Brechtian dramaturgy. What did Brecht mean by Verfremdungseffekt and what was he ultimately after? Theater practitioners often interpret the notion of "Alienation" in its most pejorative sense. They assume that Brecht wanted literally to alienate the audience: to anger and annoy them and to shove the audience's face in its own hypocrisy and mendacity. This approach has led over the decades to coundess productions of Brecht's plays in which the actors spend the entire evening metaphorically sticking their tongue out at the audience, acting as decadent and debauched and unlikeable as possible (for example, the Roundabout Theatre's 2006 production of Threepenny Opera).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Brecht and the Spring Theater Season
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.