Drift of Patented Genetically Engineered Crops: Rethinking Liability Theories
Preston, Hilary, Texas Law Review
Drift of Patented Genetically Engineered Crops: Rethinking Liability Theories^
I. Introduction
The issue of genetically engineered food has generated enormous discussion among consumers, corporations, non-profit organizations, and governments. Proponents of the technology tout genetically engineered food as the solution to world hunger.1 Supporters also argue that genetically engineered crops will lessen the environmental impact of traditional2 agriculture by reducing the use of chemical pesticides and herbicides.3 Opponents of genetically engineered food warn of myriad problems, including allergies in humans,4 pesticide and antibiotic resistance in other plants,5 ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Drift of Patented Genetically Engineered Crops: Rethinking Liability Theories.
Contributors: Preston, Hilary - Author.
Journal title: Texas Law Review.
Volume: 81.
Issue: 4
Publication date: March 2003.
Page number: 1153+.
© University of Texas, Austin, School of Law Publications, Inc. Dec 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset