Corruption of Ethics: Domestic Bribery of Public Officials: Honest Services Fraud

By Ames Iii, Orrin K. | Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, January 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

Corruption of Ethics: Domestic Bribery of Public Officials: Honest Services Fraud


Ames Iii, Orrin K., Southern Journal of Business and Ethics


Introduction

There is a broad general consensus that governmental ethics are viewed as a pillar of democracy, and corrupt behavior can threaten democratic institutions.^sup1^

This article picks up where an excellent article titled Can You Put a Price on Corruption? The Future of Honest Services Fraud, co-authored by Lara L. Kessler, Ryan J. Hunt, and William Mawer, and published in this publication in 2012,^sup2^ left off. The authors addressed the honest services mail fraud statute^sup3^ and the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Skilling v. United States^sup4^ in which the United States Supreme Court held that the honest services fraud statute would only apply where there had been actual bribery or a kickback. That ruling effectively put a stop to the efforts of U.S. Attorneys to utilize the honest services fraud statute to criminally prosecute traditional breaches of fiduciary duties in non-governmental, private business situations where the conduct involved undisclosed conflicts of interest.^sup5^ Where the statute was the DOJ's primary weapon used to address both public corruption and private breaches of fiduciary duties in business settings,^sup6^ with the Skilling ruling, its use in private fiduciary duty settings, absent traditional schemes to defraud, bribery, or kickbacks, was effectively diminished.^sup7^

Therefore, absent any corrective legislation by Congress,^sup8^ for now, the focus under the honest services fraud statute must be on the types of questions traditionally raised in fraud cases, but with a specific focus on bribery and kickbacks in the public corruption context, both state and federal.^sup9^ A primary question is how the courts will develop the concept of bribery and kickbacks in the context of the honest services fraud statute.^sup10^

The focus of the authors' article was on the effect of the Skilling ruling and how, and in what circumstances, the statute would be applied after that ruling. What the authors did not have an opportunity to address was the subsequent focus by the courts on the definition of bribery in public corruption settings, what that concept would mean in the new post-Skilling world, and how that concept would be adapted to the honest services fraud concept.^sup11^ This article, therefore, builds on their excellent work and addresses those issues

At the end of their analyses, the authors in the above article asked: " What Does the Ruling in Skilling Mean for the Future?"^sup12^ Two recent decisions that have provided a partial answer by addressing bribery under the honest services fraud statute^sup13^ in public corruption situations when First Amendment values are at stake, are the recent Sixth Circuit's decision in United States v. Terry,^sup14^ and the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in United States v. Ring.^sup15^ Terry Involved bribery in connection with campaign contributions. Ring involved bribery in connection with lobbying activities.^sup16^ An earlier opinion involving the convictions of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman and Richard Scrushy,^sup17^ and a 2012 opinion from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, United States v. McGregor,^sup18^ also provide the present context to help answer the authors' question. The Siegelman case involved bribery in a political issue campaign. The McGregor case involved bribery of public officials to get certain legislation passed. In the McGregor case, the thoughtful writing of Judge Myron Thompson on the issue of the meaning of bribery and the concept of a quid-pro-quo in the campaign contribution setting is extremely instructive.

While there were multiple issues in all of these cases, the issue with which this article deals is the courts' definition of bribery under the honest services fraud statute in a public corruption setting where First Amendment issues are at stake, the question of the whether there must be a quid-pro-quo proven under that statute and, if so, whether it must be stated or whether it is sufficient under if the quid-pro-quo is implicit. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corruption of Ethics: Domestic Bribery of Public Officials: Honest Services Fraud
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.