Defining the Party-Who Is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and Other International Institutions

By Lamm, Carolyn B.; Aqua, Jocelyn A. | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

Defining the Party-Who Is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and Other International Institutions


Lamm, Carolyn B., Aqua, Jocelyn A., The George Washington International Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

The number of international arbitrations occurring under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) has increased dramatically over the past few years. In 2001, 649 new cases, up 26 percent from 510 cases the previous year, were registered at the AAA International Center for Dispute Resolution offices in New York City and Dublin, Ireland, with parties from 63 countries participating in these cases.1 Increasingly, claims brought under AAA's International Arbitration Rules through the AAA's International Center for Dispute Resolution reflect the complex and multi-tiered nature of contemporary international transactions.2 International disputes result from complex, multi-party ventures that implicate numerous parties from different countries, IMAGE FORMULA7IMAGE FORMULA8

which may be connected to the dispute by varying degrees of involvement.3 Such disputes may concern more than one contractual agreement, and one or more of those agreements may not contain arbitration clauses that integrate all of the contracts, or contain an arbitration clause at all. Furthermore, the parties may not even have the same interests at stake or want the same arbitrators to resolve their disputes.4

Ordinarily, a party's ability or obligation to arbitrate an international dispute arises from its consent as a signatory to a contract that contains an arbitration clause.5 Article 1 of the AAA's International Arbitration Rules provides that an international arbitration shall occur "where parties have agreed in writing to arbitrate disputes."6 The 1958 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention), the legal framework by which the international community has chosen to regulate the enforcement of arbitral agreements and awards, imparts a similar writing requirement.7 Thus, it is difficult for an arbitral tribunal to consolidate and join related claims from different contracts of the same parties, or to include parties who are not signatories to the contract in dispute, as such joinder would violate the writing requirement. Organizations that administer international arbitrations, such as the AAA, often confront these situations.8

Frequently, AAA arbitrators hear cases involving multiparty disputes in which a non-signatory challenges whether it should have been named as a party and is bound to arbitrate a claim, or attempts to take advantage of another entity's arbitration clause by filing a claim pursuant to that clause.9 Although consent of the parties remains an underlying consideration foremost in the minds of the arbitrator or judge, decisions rendered by arbitral tribunals applying international rules, including those governed by arbitral institutions such as the AAA, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and recently by U.S. federal courts, reflect a general trend to extend the arbitrability of many international disputes to non-signatories to the contracts at the center of the dispute.10 This practice allows certain affected entities, such as third party beneficiaries to a contract, corporate parents, guarantors or controlling state entities, which may not normally be eligible per se to participate in arbitration, the option to choose arbitration as an alternative to litigation. Consequently, these non-signatories also may be forced to arbitrate an international dispute without explicitly consenting to arbitration. Both U.S. courts and arbitral tribunals must consider this jurisdictional question-whether a non-- signatory can be defined as a party to an arbitration-by determining if the non-signatory implicitly consented to arbitration vis-a-vis principles of agency and contract law.11 IMAGE FORMULA12

The dispute as to whether an entity has been properly named or wrongly denied standing as a party to an international arbitration arises at various times throughout the arbitral process, but often arises in response to a motion to compel an arbitration or an action to set aside an award.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Defining the Party-Who Is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and Other International Institutions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.