Factors That Account for the Formation of Prototype from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics

By Hao, Yu; Chi, Ren | Studies in Literature and Language, November 1, 2013 | Go to article overview

Factors That Account for the Formation of Prototype from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics


Hao, Yu, Chi, Ren, Studies in Literature and Language


Abstract

The study of prototype has been an interesting subject for the scholars in psycholinguistics. But some sociolinguistic scholars also advocated that the study of prototype theory can not be separated from the perspective of sociolinguistics, for the prototype affects the way people talk in different situations and the social differences play an significant role in the formation of prototype. These social factors are the deep social structure that ultimately influences our linguistic behaviors. Using the theories related to categorization to analyze the these social differences, we can find out the reasons for the differences, which mainly contain culture, living environment, scientific development, living experience and age.

Key words: Prototype; Category; Social factors

INTRODUCTION

As sociolinguistic researchers, we should be prepared to probe into various aspects of the possible relationships between language and society. It will be quite obviously from doing so that correlational studies must form a important part of sociolinguistic work. Gumperz (1971, p.223) has viewed that sociolinguistics is an attempt to find correlations between social existence and linguistic forms and to study any changes that occur. However, as Gumperz had indicated, these correlational studies do not exhaust sociolinguistic studies nor do they always proves to be as enlightening as one might hope. According to Ronald (2008, p.10), a correlation shows only a relationship between two variables; it does not show ultimate causation. To find that X and Y are related is not necessarily to discover that X causes Y, for it is also quite possible that some third factor, Z, may cause both X and Y. This paper shows the corelations in the same way, prototype theory may affects the way people use language, the social factors influence the formation of prototype, it is also possible that the social factors determines both the prototype and the use of language. This paper intends to probe in to the deep social structures that determines the formation of prototype and the way of using language.

1. PROTOTYPE THEORY

There are so many different things in the boundless universe and they have different characteristics. But how do human beings distinguish and perceive them, it is a topic which is relevant to the issue of categorization. People can take the features of these objective things as the start point, then analyze it further and classify them, later, they will get the perceptual knowledge of these things, this process is called categorization. Concepts are based on this process, so does the languages make sense of themselves. The most important theory of categorization is the Prototype Theory was proposed by Rosch (1978, pp.83-103), which is an alternative to the former view that concepts come from sets of clear? cut features which necessarily and sufficiently shared by all the members within the category. She suggests that some category members are learned as as a kind of prototype. By the prototype of a category, she means the clear examples of a category which has the goodness and typicality as the representative judged by people. To confirm this, Rosch and Mervis (1975) did research and concluded that the meaning of a word could be represented by a prototype, and other instances within a category can be categorized according to their similarity to the ideal example. For example, the word "bird" is not best represented by a set of features like wings, feathers or flying characteristics, but by the best examples, so the prototype in category of bird is something more like robin rather than penguin or ostrich.

2. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PROTOTYPE THEORY AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS

At first glance, prototype theory is a term in cognitive linguistics, it has nothing to do with sociolinguistics. But indeed, according to Ronald (2008) if we look back at the history of linguistics, it is rare to find investigations of any language which are entirely cut off from current investigations of the history of that language, or its regional and social distributions, or its relationship to objects, ideas, events, and actual speakers and listeners in the "real" world. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Factors That Account for the Formation of Prototype from the Perspective of Sociolinguistics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.