Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries

By Boyle, Elizabeth Heger | Law & Society Review, January 1, 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries


Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, Law & Society Review


State-society differentiation and political centralization interact to influence the amount, focus, and effect of legal activity. Using case studies of antinuclear power litigation in the 1970s in the United States, West Germany, France, and Sweden, this article develops a general theory of political systems and legal activity. While the United States, West Germany, and France all had considerable amounts of antinuclear litigation, in France and Germany such litigation was directed almost exclusively at the state. In the United States, the targets of antinuclear litigation were much more diffuse. Centralized Sweden with its corporatist political system had significantly less antinuclear legal activitv than the other three countries, which were roughly comparable. Germany was the only country in which the state took an active role in shaping the content of legal cases, and it was the only country where litigation became a critical factor in modifying national policy. Through these case studies, this article explores how contextual factors such as the political frames of nation-states, which exist apart from individual litigiousness and even apart from legal systems themselves may create particular cross-cultural variations in patterns of legal activity.

he amount, character, and impact of legal activity generted bv the issue of nuclear tower in the United States West Germany, France, and Sweden provides evidence of a link between political structure and legal activity. This suggests that contextual factors existing apart from individual litigiousness and even apart from legal systems themselves create particular crosscultural variations in patterns of legal activity, even in countries where legal systems are extensively incorporated into society.l In this research, I provide an explanation for cross-national variation in legal activity based on two aspects of countries' "political frames": the degree of (a) state-society differentiation and (b) political centralization. I focus on the empirical case of antinuclear power litigation in the 1970s in the United States, France, Sweden, and West Germany. By highlighting political distinctions within these nation-states, my goal is to illuminate how aspects of political structure interact with legal systems to affect social change and to shape the actions of individuals in the legal sphere.

Although the four nation-states have important differences, in the 1970s, their nuclear power programs were very similar. The issue of nuclear power became controversial in each of them when the energy crisis brought to the fore the animosity between the burgeoning environmental movement and the scientific community (Price 1990:9, 20-25).2 The four states all had strong commitments to nuclear power, and their proposed nuclear programs were comparable in size-one to two gigawatts of nuclear electricity generation per million population (Kitschelt 1984:61). Further, in each of the four nation-states, nuclear energy production was linked to nationalist sentiments regarding technological advancements and economic independence (Joppke 1993:32; Jasper 1990:68-69; Nelkin & Pollak 1981:21). In all four countries the issue of nuclear power was resolved by 1980. Despite these similarities, the character and effect of antinuclear legal activity differed a great deal across the nation-states.

Three of these differences in legal activity are notable.3 Certainly the amount of legal activity is one issue to consider (Lieberman 1983; Markesinis 1990; Munger 1988; Friedman 1989; Olson 1991). The United States, West Germany, and France all had fairly high levels of antinuclear power litigation in the 1970s; Sweden had almost none (see Price 1990; Nelkin & Pollak 1981:155; Sahr 1985).

State centrality in legal activity also varied.4 While American antinuclear litigation challenged many different public and private targets, in West Germany, France, and Sweden, the state licensing agency was the focus of nearly all litigation (Price 1990; Nelkin & Pollak 1981:155, app.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?