Amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act: How Will It Change Judicial Consideration of Employees' Claims of Discrimination?

By Valenti, Alix | Southern Law Journal, Spring 2014 | Go to article overview

Amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act: How Will It Change Judicial Consideration of Employees' Claims of Discrimination?


Valenti, Alix, Southern Law Journal


I. INTRODUCTION

When the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed in 1990, it was heralded as landmark legislation for persons with disabilities. In signing the bill, then President George H.W. Bush remarked that the Act "signals the end to the unjustified segregation and exclusion of persons with disabilities for the mainstream of American life."* 1 The general provisions of the initial Act noted that the law will affect "some 43,000,000 Americans" with one or more physical or mental impairments, a number which is likely to increase as the population ages.2 According to Committee reports, the ADA was intended to address a "compelling need" for a "clear and comprehensive national mandate" to prevent discrimination against the disabled.3

Despite initial optimism surrounding passage of the law, it was not long after that public sentiment, fueled by media reports that the Act was producing inappropriate windfalls for disability plaintiffs and their lawyers, turned against the legislation.4 In addition, the courts' narrow interpretation of who was disabled under the Act precluded many people who appeared to be covered from pressing their claims of discrimination. According to one study, in the first seven years after its passage, defendant employers won 94% of cases at the trial court level and 84% of cases appealed by losing plaintiffs.5 As a result, Congress amended the ADA, effective January 1, 2009, to broaden the definition of disability. However, whether these amendments will effectively enhance litigants' chances of success in the courts remains questionable.6 This paper first reviews the courts' decisions regarding the scope of the ADA prior to the amendments, followed by a discussion of the changes made by the 2008 amendments (ADAAA). It will then focus on cases decided after the amendments regarding the definitions of disability, ability to perform the essential functions of the job, and reasonable accommodation. It will conclude by a discussion of implications for scholars and practitioners.

II. Interpretation of the ADA before the Amendments

As originally worded, Title I of the ADA prohibited employers from discriminating "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability of such individual . . . ."7 Title II prohibits discrimination with respect to services, programs or activities of a public entity such as a school, hospital or prison. Title III protects individuals from discrimination at places of public accommodation, such as restaurants, hotels, or entertainment centers. To establish a prima facie case under Title I of the ADA, the plaintiff must establish that (1) (s)he is disabled within the meaning of the ADA; (2) (s)he is qualified (with or without a reasonable accommodation) to perform the essential functions of the position; and (3) the employer took an adverse employment action because of his or her disability. Unlike most other civil rights statues, the ADA required plaintiffs to demonstrate that they are in the protected class in order to proceed with their claims.8 Thus, it is this first requirement that has engendered the greatest amount of controversy because it in effect acts as a gatekeeper: if the plaintiff cannot establish that he or she is disabled, the court will dismiss the case without a chance for offering evidence on the second and third issues. In order to establish disability, the ADA further provides that the plaintiff must show that he or she (1) has "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities""; or (2) has "a record of such an impairment;"" or (3) is "regarded as having such an impairment."9 This so called three-prong test was intended to broaden the definition of disability; however, the courts' narrow interpretation of these definitions has limited plaintiffs' recovery under the Act, especially with respect to the first classification.

The determination of whether a plaintiff is disabled must be made on a case-by-case basis. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act: How Will It Change Judicial Consideration of Employees' Claims of Discrimination?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.