The Good Reputation Index 2002: A Tale of Two Strategies
Johns, Gary, Review - Institute of Public Affairs
OR three years, Reputation Measurement Ltd and The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald have been trying to impose their political agendas on Australia's top 100 corporations. They think that Australia's corporations should be good citizens, and that by measuring what they think it means to be a good citizen, they can change corporate behaviour.
Westpac ranked number one on the 2002 Index, and rated well in every category. Flight Centre ranked number one on financial performance, but 47 overall. It was in the doldrums in every other category, including being ranked 99 on environment. On the surface this seems very strange-Flight Centre manages shopfront travel agencies! The reason …
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: The Good Reputation Index 2002: A Tale of Two Strategies.
Contributors: Johns, Gary - Author.
Magazine title: Review - Institute of Public Affairs.
Volume: 55.
Issue: 1
Publication date: March 2003.
Page number: 15.
© Institute of Public Affairs Nov 2008.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
One moment ...
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset