Restoring the Rule of Law in the Construction Industry

By Abbott, Tony | Review - Institute of Public Affairs, March 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Restoring the Rule of Law in the Construction Industry

Abbott, Tony, Review - Institute of Public Affairs

As this issue of the IPA Review was at the press, we were alerted to the delivery of the following speech by the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations. The paper marks a seminal change in the government's approach to systemic corruption in the construction industry, and is another major step in the reform of workplace relations in Australia.

Last week, the Government tabled 22 volumes of the Cole Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. Former Court of Appeal judge Terence Cole made 392 specific findings of unlawful conduct and, in the confidential final volume, recommended that 31 individuals be referred for possible criminal prosecution. As was to be expected, the construction unions claimed that the report was a witchhunt and people who should have known better claimed that Cole was biased.

The anti-union allegations were never very plausible given that most unions had refused to cooperate with the Commission and had even boycotted the Commission's special conference on occupational health and safety. As things have turned out, one of their own has fatally undermined the unions' case. No less an authority than the National Secretary of the Construction Division of the CFMEU has unwittingly confirmed that Cole is right. In what was, no doubt, an unguarded moment, John Sutton admitted to a Melbourne newspaper that "virtually everything we do breaches part of this Act". Sutton's admission means that Cole's description of a largely lawless industry can be disputed at the margins but not credibly denied. The problems of the industry have been established beyond credible doubt and the question now is: what needs to be done about it?

Nothing, says the CFMEU, because it's alright to break the law in the best interests of the working class. Leading union officials take the view that, in a tough industry, only wimps take the law seriously. The news that "only" 31 individuals had been recommended to face criminal charges was greeted with something approaching jubilation, as if the industry's code of silence based on fear had largely kept the Royal Commission at bay.

As the Australian Financial Review commented in an editorial, the union's dismissive reaction to Cole's report "speaks as loudly as his damning findings of entrenched lawlessness". Imagine the reaction if a royal commissioner had identified 31 people in the finance industry or the steel industry for possible criminal charges. This would rightly be regarded as the sign of an industry in crisis demanding urgent government intervention.

Change won't be easy in an industry conditioned to think that might is right. Change which shifts power from one unscrupulous group to another will not be reform. As Grocon has discovered, the first company to "buck the system" is liable to heavy-duty industrial payback. No one wants to be the first to change but change is necessary in the national interest.

In 2002, the Victorian construction industry alone accounted for 17 per cent of all days lost through strikes. The West Australian construction industry accounted for another 8 per cent of the national strike tally. Construction is a $40 billion a year industry comprising nearly six per cent of GDP and employing nearly 500,000 Australians. Due to over-manning, demarcation disputes and chronic stoppages, labour productivity in commercial construction averages 13 per cent less than in home building. Plastering the same wall in the same way costs 40 per cent more in a high rise building than in a standard house. Just raising labour productivity in commercial construction to the home building standard (let alone the 50 per cent increase needed to match North American levels) would mean, according to Econtech, a one per cent drop in the cost of living, a one per cent increase in GDP and $2.3 billion in benefits to consumers, workers and taxpayers every year.

Still, change is about decent Australian values not just a more efficient industry.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Restoring the Rule of Law in the Construction Industry


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?