Research and Representation: A Conundrum for Behavior Analysts

By Bolling, Madelon Y. | Behavior and Social Issues, Fall 2002 | Go to article overview

Research and Representation: A Conundrum for Behavior Analysts


Bolling, Madelon Y., Behavior and Social Issues


Abstract: Historically, populations of color have been ignored in psychotherapy research. Fortunately with growing awareness of social justice issues, funding institutions require proportional ethnic diversity in research samples. However, psychotherapy itself is a highly culture-bound mainstream phenomenon that generally ignores and thereby perpetuates issues of power. Minority individuals likely to participate in psychotherapy tend to be a highly acculturated subset. Non-acculturated peoples often perceive their problems so differently that "psychotherapy" is a nonsensical solution. Funding agencies' requirements that researchers recruit representative numbers of minority subjects may inadvertently amount to a campaign for cultural colonization, which is clearly unethical. Can behavior analysts tease out the issues and ethics involved? Is behavior analysis itself irrevocably culture-bound?

CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND

Though there are those who question the relevance of such a topic to the analysis of human social behavior, this paper refers extensively to psychotherapy research. The purpose is not to debate the appropriateness, behavioral orthodoxy, or effectiveness of this kind of research, but to point out the problematic nature of some traditions of social science itself, using psychotherapy research as a case in point. Issues mentioned here need to be considered in any behavioral intervention research that requires a representative sample of subjects or that deals with non-mainstream subjects in single-subject research. Specifically, any time an intervention has an interpersonal aspect, cultural assumptions shaped by contingencies of the researchers' and the participants' respective social environments are operating. The notion of scientific research itself carries cultural assumptions with it. It may be that we ignore culture, especially our own, as a factor simply because we wish to be "impartial," but it is fallacious (one might even say unscientific) and ethically unsound to do so.

I work in a research lab developing a Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (Kohlenberg and Tsai, 1991) enhanced treatment for depression. We hope to reach "empirically-supported treatment" status in order to bring principles of behavioral analysis to the medicalized field of psychotherapy. Thus, while our background isSkinnerian, we find ourselves deeply involved in group-comparison statistical design. Although it is possible to establish empirical evidence of efficacy through the more behavioral method of multiple single subject designs, this requires therapists as well as adherence raters competent in our method to be well established in at least three different geographical locations. Our approach, especially regarding methods of effective therapist training, is still under development. Meanwhile, support for the work needed to develop such methods is available almost exclusively from government agencies, whose standard for evidence of efficacy is the group-comparison design. Single-subject research will likely be the best way to extend our research into culturally distinct populations, once our methods are recognized as efficacious by the National Institutes of Health. Even so, culture, acculturation, assumptions about the nature of the world, and the different meanings of "research" to non-mainstream populations are as pertinent to single-subject research as to group-comparison research.

There are two main issues at stake here: 1) the scientific standards and traditions of group-comparison research requiring representative sampling diversity; and 2) confusion between culture and genetic heritage when dealing with the social manifestations of distress which our culture labels "psychological disorders."

There is strong language in the Public Health Service (U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1998) application for grants:

Women and members of minority groups and their sub-populations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification establishes inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research . …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Research and Representation: A Conundrum for Behavior Analysts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.