Money and the Moral Order in Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century American Capitalism

By Hamer, John H. | Anthropological Quarterly, July 1998 | Go to article overview

Money and the Moral Order in Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century American Capitalism


Hamer, John H., Anthropological Quarterly


The moral use of money in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century is consdered by examining a sample of thireen American entrepreneurs. Bourdieu's concepts on economic and symbolic capital, as well as Appadurai's ideas about linking desire and sacrifice through exchange are used to show how some entrepreneurs redistributed their wealth through philanthropy. Other men of wealth remained committed to personal accumulation. The concept of habitus is shown to be limited in explaining the differences in the moral distribution of wealth. [philanthropy, wealth distribution, money and morality, historic capitalism, economic alturism]

In this article I examine motivations for the philanthropic use of money, as opposed to the purely market oriented accumulation of wealth. I ask questions about the social forces and cultural processes that surrounded nineteenth and twentieth-century American entrepreneurs who gave away accumulated wealth, while other entrepreneurs ignored giving. Both groups were concerned with capital accumulation, but the philanthropic conceived of money as having moral potential, while the non-philanthropic entrepreneurs thought of money only in terms of rational gain and loss. Though considered irrational in terms of market forces, giving money away in the late nineteenth and early twentieth-century America could also be conceived, as I show, as supportive of the moral order.

Several anthropologists have considered this issue in other cultures. For example, Bloch and Parry (1989) have investigated the morality of transactions cross-culturally and found that money has been viewed as neutral to negative in short-term transactions. But money is highly moral when combined with ritual and symbolism in long term transactions concerning deities and one's relation to the cosmos. Though none of the essays in this collection examines capitalism, Bloch and Parry suggest that a "mature ideology" of the morality of exchange may be quite different from that of other cultures. For capitalist economies it is possible that greed is necessary to maintain public well-being as short and long-term values become merged (pp. 29-30). There is a clue here as to what has been happening in the postmodern capitalism of the late twentieth century, but it tells us nothing about the moral implications of monetary exchange in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It is possible that the latter case is more like those of other cultures, in which the long-term vision of money is associated with the moral order of the cosmos. The purpose of this article is to examine the consequences of variable moral idealism among a small sample of wealthy American capitalists of that era, as it relates to cultural values and individual emotive power.

The theoretical grounding of this analysis is in the habitus and economic concepts of Bourdieu, and the exchange theory of Appadurai. Bourdieu indicates how "economic" capital can be changed into "symbolic" capital as an attempt to create a "misrecognition" so that an interested gift appears to be a "disinterested" gift(s) (1990: 112). Over time it is possible for the observer, as Bourdieu suggests, to perceive acts of generosity as seeming to transcend the time aspect of exchange, so as to create a sense of institutionalized obligation on the part of the recipient which tends to support the economic capital of the donor. He maintains that "interested calculation" is never absent from the "most generous exchange" (p. 115).

Appadurai shows how the transfer between the two forms of capital can be made. In his formulation the conflict between the desire for an object and the sacrifice to be made to obtain it is overcome through exchange (1986: 3). Exchange is political in the sense that those who have control over commodities should naturally seek to limit their flow, but as there are always contests for control there is a loosening of rules and increasing availability of desirable objects, if only to attract supporters in the contest (p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Money and the Moral Order in Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century American Capitalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.