Questioning the Assumptions Behind Art Criticism

By Venable, Bradford B. | Art Education, September 1998 | Go to article overview

Questioning the Assumptions Behind Art Criticism


Venable, Bradford B., Art Education


Art educators who have developed methods of art criticism have provided techniques to help students understand more thoroughly how enriching an encounter with art might be. While many methods exist, most are similar in structure to those proposed by Gene Mittler (1973,1980) and Edmund Feldman (1970). These methods provide sequential procedures intended to lead the student from the initial encounter with an artwork to a deeper and richer understanding. Many of these techniques require students to begin their critical inquiry by thoroughly describing what they see. Students move on to more complex analysis and greater understanding via interpretation and judgment. While these methods are beneficial in increasing students' perceptivity and understanding, some have asserted that their reliance on formalist aesthetic theory has created problems, reducing the ways in which art can be understood or judged significant (Gouma-Peterson & Mathews, 1987; Nochlin, 1971). The historic or cultural component in a work of art, for example, may not be noted unless teachers underscore this dimension. There are other critical issues. In this paper, I will examine three assumptions evident in the practice of these methods: a) the connection of first impressions with the viewer's past experience, b) the connection between sequential procedures and learning, and c) the use of judgment as a necessary step in understanding.

FIRST IMPRESSIONS AND PAST EXPERIENCE

All of us bring different and unique life experiences to an encounter with art. Not only do the abilities to see, understand, interpret, and judge works of art differ greatly from individual to individual, but previous encounters with art and varying attitudes, if not the totality of our visual experience, influence how art is initially perceived. Logically, the viewer who has grown up surrounded by art will experience art differently from one who has not Does not the world traveler have a frame of reference different from those of us who have remained landlocked? Moreover, cannot the same be true for all visual experiences? Will not the more varied experience of visual phenomena influence, if not determine, how we understand art? I suggest that an encounter with art is not only influenced (if not mediated) by the entirety of past visual experiences, but by the totality of the personal human experience as well. This human experience includes not only the images that have passed before our eyes, but the entire scope of our lived experience.

How do Mittler's, Feldman's and other widely used methods for teaching art criticism use the unique personal experience of the viewer? Both trained and untrained viewers of art make connections between what they have experienced in their own lives and the artwork before them. Many methods of art criticism make little use of such experiences. Mittler's model, for example, refers to these initial encounters as "premature decision-making" and invites the student to move past them. While they may appear to be naive reactions, are these unsophisticated responses by students to be ignored and quickly left behind?

A child responding to Cassatt's The Bath may say that it reminds her of how her mother lovingly washes her baby sister. Another may view Eakin's The Swimming Hole and want to discuss the local strip pit where swimming is popular. Homer's Gulf Stream may bring up enthusiastic tales of ocean monsters or the movie Jaws. Obviously, these responses may indicate a less than thorough understanding of the artwork, yet the sensitive teacher will realize that these youthful experiences make what is seen understandable, worthwhile, and relevant. They should not be abandoned, but encouraged and built upon.

By disregarding such responses, the teacher may suggest that these kinds of reactions are not relevant in coming to an understanding of art. However, is this not how all of us come to art initially? Are we not drawn to (or repelled by) certain subject matter over others because of our personal and unique experience with it?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Questioning the Assumptions Behind Art Criticism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.