Creating Rules of Procedure for Federal Courts: Administrative Prerogative or Legislative Policymaking?

By Johnson, Lori A. | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2003 | Go to article overview

Creating Rules of Procedure for Federal Courts: Administrative Prerogative or Legislative Policymaking?


Johnson, Lori A., Justice System Journal


The responsibility for making the rules of practice and procedure that structure litigation in federal courts has always been shared between the legislative and judicial branches. From the 1930s to the early 1970s, judicial branch committees dominated the process, and Congress uniformly accepted their recommendations. Then Congress began to express much more interest in the rules for federal courts, and the environment of procedural rulemaking became increasingly politicized. In this article, I review the historical trends toward politicization of procedural rulemaking and the resulting changes in the political dynamics between Congress and the judicial branch.

In our federal system of shared power across separate institutions, the three branches of government often must interact to accomplish their objectives. From the creation of the lower federal courts in the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress and the judicial branch have shared the responsibility for creating the rules of procedure that structure litigation in the federal courts. For cases at law, Congress generally called for the federal courts to follow state practice, and this intention was codified in the Conformity Act of 1872. Nevertheless, as early as 1792, Congress authorized the Supreme Court to promulgate rules of procedure for equity cases, and the Court adopted the first set of such rules in 1822. The Supreme Court continued to update and revise the equity rules, substantially modernizing and simplifying them in 1912. The adoption of uniform equity rules across all federal courts inspired assiduous efforts on the part of the American Bar Association to convince Congress to grant the Supreme Court the authority to adopt such uniform rules for cases at law. These lobbying efforts were unsuccessful for twenty years, but in 1934 the coalition necessary for the success of these efforts came into being.

Enabling the Supreme Court

In 1934 Congress passed the Rules Enabling Act giving the judicial branch authority to promulgate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Civil Rules), which were adopted in 1938. The successful passage of the act was the result of a powerful alliance between Arthur Vanderbilt, then president of the American Bar Association, Attorney General Homer Cummings, and Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes. According to the act, the Supreme Court would have the power to promulgate rules of procedure for civil actions as long as these procedural rules did not "abridge, enlarge, nor modify the substantive rights of any litigant." This distinction between procedure and substance was an important limiting component in Congress's delegation of rulemaking authority.

The Supreme Court selected an Advisory Committee composed of law professors and lawyers to formulate the initial version of the Civil Rules. Early in the process, the Advisory Committee, with the support of the Chief Justice, decided to merge the systems of law and equity and issue uniform rules for all civil cases. Although no judges were on the initial Advisory Committee, each federal judicial circuit had a conference to discuss the rules and make recommendations to the committee. The relatively new Judicial Conference of Senior Circuit Judges of the Courts of Appeals, created in 1922, had no formal role in the process but played an informal advisory role. The Advisory Committee spent three years working on the Civil Rules and prepared at least three drafts that were circulated to the members of the judicial branch and the bar before the Civil Rules were submitted to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court itself made several amendments before sending the Civil Rules to Congress. According to the Rules Enabling Act, after the Supreme Court transmits the rules to Congress, they take effect sixty days after the end of the legislative session as long as Congress takes no action regarding them. The original Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted in this manner in 1938. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Creating Rules of Procedure for Federal Courts: Administrative Prerogative or Legislative Policymaking?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.