Think-Tank Proposes Pentagon-Wide 'Pedigreed Database'

By Hinkle, Jeffrey J. | National Defense, October 1998 | Go to article overview

Think-Tank Proposes Pentagon-Wide 'Pedigreed Database'


Hinkle, Jeffrey J., National Defense


Industry and government leaders are calling for the creation of a uniform database to aid the Pentagon's efforts to support the modeling and simulation community. They believe such a step will help to make the promise of modeling and simulation a reality.

The National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Database Standardization Committeemade up of key executives from the public and private sectors is also requesting increased funding to improve modeling and simulation. The committee is also asking the Pentagon to create a list of modeling priorities which will allow industry to respond in kind.

The database standardization committee, founded in 1996, spent nearly a year studying the issues concerning what roles modeling and simulation will and should play in the Defense Department's future.

Members of the committee include Gen. Lawrence F Skibbie, USA, (Ret), president of NDIA, representatives of numerous corporations-including Northrop Grumman Corporation, Texas Instruments, Boeing, Presearch, Inc-as well as numerous Pentagon officials. "A broad perspective," was ensured, said one committee member, by picking a diverse group of Pentagon and industry leaders.

Cost Effective

One conclusion the committee reached early on in their discussions was the cost effectiveness of the Pentagon designing and maintaining databases with a proven history, or a pedigreed system, to support a set of standardized models.

This, the committee determined, would "ensure greater consistency and credibility among studies [and] allow studies to begin sooner and be conducted faster and more economically than the process allows today. Both government and industry would share in the cost avoidance."

Committee members cited the existing Air Force legacy process, concluding it satisfied a need for "coherent, consistent, documented data." Therefore, they determined that a Pentagon-wide pedigreed database should be the first step taken in support of future modeling and simulation efforts.

"The key to this pedigree process is the acceptance and application of data standards by all data sources supporting the process," said a representatve of the ad hoc committee.

The committee concluded one problem with status quo views of modeling and simulation is that "no commonly agreed-upon direction exists for coherent, consistent, documented system data." The establishment of a standard referenced database process, the group estimated, would save 30 to 80 percent in future study costs.

"Once the policy is in place, prioritize the models used most frequently and apply the pedigree process to the databases for these models," suggested committee members.

The group did say existing funding is inadequate to support such a project They specifically called for financial assistance to support the establishment of a certification process in the areas of modeling and simulation. Such a process will "provide credibility and prevent misuse,' they said.

Data sharing among various defense organizations that rely on modeling and simulation is another approach that the defense and industry leaders are championing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Think-Tank Proposes Pentagon-Wide 'Pedigreed Database'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.