How Did It Ever Come to This?

By Gray, James | Medical Economics, October 19, 1998 | Go to article overview

How Did It Ever Come to This?


Gray, James, Medical Economics


Once all but unnoticed by doctors, the specter of professional liability now clouds their lives.

"You cannot get a judgment against a doctor," declared a Medical Economics article in 1934. Malpractice insurance was something doctors carried, but assumed they wouldn't need. In fact, most doctors those days had never even heard of a malpractice lawsuit within their professional circle.

The first crack in the judicial barrier protecting doctors appeared in the 1940s. In the 10 years following World War II, the volume of malpractice claims doubled. By 1957, a doctor's chances of being sued were 1 in 7. It was not a matter of multiple claims being filed against a few suit-prone doctors; 86 percent of physicians had been hit with just one claim.

Also in 1957, plaintiffs' attorney Melvin Belli boasted in these pages about winning awards of $200,000 and up, calling them "an indication that justice is at long last being done:' By 1963, we'd seen the first $1 million payout. In 1965, when the courts decided that hospitals could be sued for malpractice, too, awards skyrocketed. By 1996, the typical (median) award was $568,000, but a handful of astronomical awards had boosted the average to nearly $2.3 million.

How did it come to this? Are doctors so terrible? Are lawyers the problem? What about patients? Insurers? The courts? In fact, everyone has played a part.

America's postwar change of attitude

Officially, malpractice has been defined as "a gross departure from accepted standards of practice." Since about the 1950sfrom the vantage point of the plaintiffs-it's been more like "anything a doctor does that's less than perfect," or even "any bad result."

As the country emerged from World War II, doctors could hardly have foreseen what was in store. Litigation had begun to increase in those postwar boom years, but that was largely because so many more people could afford medical care. Another key factor was the growing complexity of medicine. An abundance of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, along with new and more potent drugs, brought higher standards of care-but also new risks of injury.

The boom in medical knowledge also raised patient expectations. "Medicine has trumpeted the advances of technology and created the impression that it has the answers to all problems:' notes Philadelphia malpractice attorney James Lewis Griffith Sr. "Medicine oversold its act, causing patients to believe that the only explanation for a bad result is physician error. A more factual discussion of the difficulties and unknowns might have kept expectations at a more reasonable level."

The volume of claims rose steadily throughout the 1960s, then exploded in the early '70s: Four times as many suits were filed in 1971-1975 as in the previous 35 years.

Postwar prosperity and the rise of the middle class had created "a new confidence among the population, a growing assertiveness, and the willingness to question authority" notes Jeffrey O'Connell, professor at the University of Virginia Law School.

"In the early 20th century," O'Connell says, "a doctor could tell a young man that his wife had died of `complications: Today, we're all far more sophisticated. Even the most placid young man will question the doctor, demand a full explanation, and think about suing."

This shift in popular attitude was soon reflected in the courts.

Making it easier to sue physicians

Over the past 150 years, the courts have gone from hands-off to hands-on in physician-patient relations. In the mid-1800s, the government had almost nothing to do with private transactions between doctor and patient; it was strictly caveat emptor The government did guarantee the sanctity of contracts, and provided a forum (the courts) to redress negligence (malpractice).

In the late 19th century, the courts determined that a doctor's professional performance should be measured against the standard of care in his local community.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Did It Ever Come to This?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.