American Canvas: A Roundtable on the 1997 NEA Report

By Brenson, Michael; Diaz, Alejandro et al. | Art Journal, Fall 1998 | Go to article overview

American Canvas: A Roundtable on the 1997 NEA Report


Brenson, Michael, Diaz, Alejandro, Kim, Judy, Lisiewicz, Malgorzata, Murray, Jessica, Art Journal


On October 13, 1997, the New York Times ran a front-page story with the bombshell headline "Study Links Drop in Support to Elitist Attitude in the Arts." The study is American Canvas, a Igo-page book published by the National Endowment for the Arts and intended, in the words of its now-departed chairman, Jane Alexander, to look at the "ecology of the arts process . . . and at different models for stabilization and survival" (4). The Times story set off a feeding frenzy in the national news media. Many journalists were eager to subject the endowment and artists to the contempt that the media and politicians had poured on them in 1989, when the endowment crisis began. What made the Times article so shocking to many arts professionals who had exhausted themselves fighting for the endowment's survival was its assertion that the endowment was now placing the responsibility for the current crisis in arts funding squarely on the shoulders of the art world. No one and nothing else shared the blame, not Jesse Helms, the Christian Coalition, museum boards, the news media, or the NEA itself.

After spending hours with friends trying to clarify the assumptions behind the Times article, I began to wonder how younger arts professionals who had not been combatants in the culture wars would respond to the book. What would fresh voices say about issues I and many others had cared about so deeply, for so long, that we may no longer have the distance to frame them in ways that can inspire fruitful conversation? I thought of the Curatorial Studies Program at Bard College-the only curatorial program in the United States exclusively concerned with contemporary art-where I had taught a writing course in the spring of 1997 and would be teaching another in the spring of 1998. I found the students thoughtful, candid, and unpredictable. I had no idea what their responses to American Canvas would be.

The book was based on six regional forums held in 1996 (Columbus; Los Angeles; Salt Lake City; Rock Hill, South Carolina/Charlotte, North Carolina; San Antonio; Miami). In each one, arts professionals and civic leaders were asked to consider the beneficial effects of art on communities. The challenge, the book states, "is to transform the arts in the civic context from their present status as amenities that are added once the necessities are taken care of, into one of the primary means of addressing those necessities in the first place" (167). The book's attack on the complacency of the art world was welcome. So was its wake-up call to arts organizations, which must learn to work together. Some of its stories about the effects of art on the everyday lives of struggling people were inspiring.

But the book is immediately confusing. The role of the author, Gary O. Larson, is unclear and uneasy; and an explanation about him and his voice is never provided. In addition, in her introduction, Alexander does not explain why the book was published at this point-the month she resigned. In another Times article published that October announcing her resignation, Alexander blasted conservative critics for "attempting to capitalize on public outrage over a minuscule number of controversial projects that had received Federal support." But that anger is nowhere to be found in the book, which reserves much of its hostility for large arts institutions without having the sense to recognize how self-defeating it is to essentially exclude them from a national conversation about art and community. Published roughly two years after the endowment eliminated grants to individual artists to ensure its survival, the book avoids the issue of individual artists almost completely. In short, with all the admirable ideas and sentiments expressed in it, we could not take anything in it at face value. What is American Canvas? Why was it written? What does it say about the endowment now? Why is it obsessed with community? What does community mean? The following roundtable was held in New York in November 1997. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

American Canvas: A Roundtable on the 1997 NEA Report
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.