Resolving International Contract Disputes

By DiMatteo, Larry A. | Dispute Resolution Journal, November 1998 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Resolving International Contract Disputes


DiMatteo, Larry A., Dispute Resolution Journal


The author examines the effect the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) has had on international arbitration. He reviews the general principles of good faith and fairness, and explains how these provide the framework for arbitrators to apply CISG provisions as evidence of general principles of international contract law.

The impact of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)' on international arbitration has been felt in two areas. First, its adoption as the domestic contract law of the individual signatories will require its application by arbitrators under conflict of law rules.2 Courts and arbitral tribunals will be required to apply its rules when it is determined that it is the law of the case. Second, it may be voluntarily applied as evidence of customary international law. Arbitration tribunals are more likely than courts to recognize it as a source of customary international contract law. It is the product of compromise between three of the world's major legal systemscommon law, civil law, and socialist law.3 Thus, it possesses a universal appeal that many arbitrators will find appealing in their search for a lex mercatoria-type of justification for their awards. It is this second use of the CISG by arbitral tribunals-as evidence of customary international contract lawthat this article is directed.

Basis in International Contract Law

General principles of international law often play pivotal roles in international dispute resolution. "Modern judges and arbitrators tend more to seek to interpret and supplement instruments according to autonomous and internationally uniform principles."4 The CISG, as with most codes, reflects a recognition of generalized principles of law. Professor Clive Schmitthoff, former lecturer at the City of London University, in making reference to the development of an international trade law code, noted that it should possess "principles which should apply to all international trade transactions." A code is most likely to be successful if it recognizes and harmonizes existing general principles of law. The following is a brief review of the general principles of national contract laws and those found in the internationalization of contract law in general.5 The general principles include the duty of good faith and substantive fairness concerns.

From the medieval lex mercatoria to the present, most specific rules of business can be traced to the norms of good faith and fair dealing. The obligation of good faith is found in most national legal systems6Bad faith in the negotiation or performance of a contract will void a provision in a contract that was produced by the bad faith act.' Expansive interpretations of contractual good faith include good faith in negotiations, the duty to cooperate, the duty to adjust from the express terms of the contract, and good faith in the termination of contractual relations. The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) Principles of International Commercial Contracts8 can be seen as a supplementary set of principles to be used in conjunction with the CISG. Article 1.7 of these principles "indicates that the parties' behavior must conform to good faith and fair dealing throughout the life of the contracts, including the negotiation process."9

Fairness in the exchange or substantive fairness concerns have increasingly been accepted as a major norm or principle of contract law at the supranational level. One commentator on international commercial contracts predicts a continuing shift from the strict enforcement of contracts to fairness in the exchange and good faith norms.

Though the principle of sanctity remains strong, relational elements are on the rise.... [There has been] a major shift towards relationalism and a recognition of equitable considerations. Principles of equity have been fully recognized with respect to the duties of good faith, renegotiation, and gap-filling.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Resolving International Contract Disputes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?