Completing the Evaluation Triangle for the Next Century: Measuring Child "Well-Being" in Family Foster Care

By Altshuler, Sandra J.; Gleeson, James P. | Child Welfare, January/February 1999 | Go to article overview

Completing the Evaluation Triangle for the Next Century: Measuring Child "Well-Being" in Family Foster Care


Altshuler, Sandra J., Gleeson, James P., Child Welfare


In recent years, success in family foster care has been evaluated by examining indicators of two goals of the child welfare system: permanency and safety. Systematic measures of child well-being have not been incorporated into the administrative databases that are used for case monitoring and evaluation. This article describes how child well-being has been conceptualized and measured in research on family foster care, and discusses the essential dimensions that should be included in a useful measure of child well-being. Challenges in incorporating measures of child wellbeing into ongoing evaluations of family foster care are discussed.

We found no means being used or proposed for assessing, at specific intervals, the extent of change in and adequacy of a child's situation.. . The evaluations by local child welfare officials were primarily concerned with areas such as maintenance of case files, service planning, and service delivery... We believe that the effectiveness of any assistance program must be expressed in terms relative to the well-being of the program's target population. [USDHEW 1976: 64, quoted in Magura & Moses 1986: 2]

More than 20 years ago, the U. S. General Accounting Office concluded that the existing mechanisms for evaluating effectiveness did not allow systematic examination of the well-being of children in the care and custody of the child welfare system. In 1980, Magura and Moses [1980] challenged the field to move beyond measures of case events to develop systematic measures of child well-being that could be used to assess changes in children's situations and functioning during their involvement with the child welfare system. The U.S. Children's Bureau has consistently stated that the three primary goals of child welfare services are the achievement of safety and protection, timely permanence, and child well-being [Williams 1998]. Logically, evaluations of success in child welfare would triangulate measures of these three goals to determine effectiveness of service. Despite these exhortations, success in family foster care has been evaluated in recent years by examining indicators of only two goals of the child welfare system: permanency and safety. As the 21st century approaches, little progress has been made in incorporating systematic measures of child well-being into ongoing evaluations of family foster care.

This article offers direction for incorporating measures of child well-being into evaluations of success for family foster care. It discusses the need for these measures and the reasons that they have not been incorporated into administrative databases, describes the ways that child well-being has been conceptualized and measured in research that has focused on children living in family foster care, and discusses the essential dimensions that should be included in a useful measure of child well-being. It concludes with a discussion of the challenges in incorporating measures of child well-being into ongoing evaluations of family foster care to guide policy and practice into the next century.

Background

Not surprisingly, efforts to incorporate systematic measures of child well-being into evaluations of family foster care have not been sustained. Growth and changes in family foster care caseloads have placed considerable demands on the child welfare system, diverting energies and resources to meet these demands. This caseload growth has occurred in an era of political conservatism, increased scrutiny of the child welfare system, and class action lawsuits designed to reform the system. The advent of increased accountability, expedited permanency, managed care, and outcome-based contracting has redefined the policy environment for the child welfare system and pushed it to produce selfevaluations that address these critical issues, but do not necessarily focus on the well-being of children in family foster care.

For example, measures of child well-being are not part of most child welfare administrative databases and are not usually included in regular evaluations of child welfare system performance and family foster care.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Completing the Evaluation Triangle for the Next Century: Measuring Child "Well-Being" in Family Foster Care
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.