Companies Weigh the Cost of Pensions Bill
Green, Paula L., Global Finance
Potential changes to the way companies calculate their pensions program funding could save them a fortune. But the wait is agonizing.
Corporate finance executives in the US are eagerly tracking a piece of federal legislation that could save companies billions of dollars when funding their pension programs. The provision, part of a bill known as the Pension Preservation and Savings Expansion Act of 2003, would change the interest rate benchmark used for calculating the minimum funding obligations of defined benefit plans. Right now, corporations must use a low interest rate based on the defunct 30-year treasury bond that forces them, they say, to kick in more money than is truly necessary to keep their pension plans financially sound.
The use of an interest rate based on a composite of long-term, conservative corporate bonds would more accurately reflect market conditions, a mix of business and labor proponents argue. Since the interest rate would be higher than the rate on the 30-year treasury bond, the revision would reduce the amount of funds that corporations must shift into their pension plans each year and free up a considerable amount of money.
"We want something that is more predictable, less volatile and more accurate so we can avoid funding at an artificially high amount because of an artificially low rate," says Geof Kusch, director of global benefits at Dow Chemical in Midland, Michigan. "We can use that money to reinvest in businesses and create jobs."
Executives and financial analysts are especially rattled because a temporary legislative fix that lets plan sponsors use a more flexible benchmark for calculating their funding obligation rates expires at the end of this year. That provision, part of the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, increased the range of permissible interest rates to 120% of the four-year weighted average of the current 30-year treasury rate. But when it expires, pension plan actuaries will be forced by law to re-turn to a lower benchmark rate. The cost for individual companies in 2004 will range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars. General Motors' recent announcement that it will be topping up its pension fund with the proceeds of a more than $10 billion debt offering-the biggest corporate bond issue ever-gives an indication of the magnitude of the problem companies are up against.
"This is a huge financial issue for many companies. CFOs have to ask themselves, 'What is my next step here?'" says Bob Shepler, director of federal affairs for Financial Executives International, an organization for financial professionals. Shepler works in the Washington, DC, office of the Florham Park, NJ-based group.
CFOs are hoping the current legislation-known as the Portman-Cardin bill for its sponsors, Representatives Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Maryland)-or at least the provision regarding pension interest rates will be approved by the third quarter of this year so they can plan their 2004 budgets accordingly. And they aren't very happy with some congressional efforts to provide another temporary solution to the interest rate dilemma.
"That helps, but it's not a permanent fix," says Richard Mandera, manager of employee benefits analysis at AK Steel in Middletown, Ohio. "We'd like to get a permanent fix that is tied to an index of corporate bonds. That would be more realistic."
Corporations are already being squeezed by pension funding shortfalls in order to make up for three years of plummeting equity returns and some of the lowest interest rates in four decades. A study released last fall by Credit Suisse First Boston that focused on the 360 plans in the S&P 500 Index, for example, estimated that the plans could be underfunded in aggregate by $243 billion by the end of 2002.
The AFL-CIO supports this reform because labor worries that if the …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Companies Weigh the Cost of Pensions Bill. Contributors: Green, Paula L. - Author. Magazine title: Global Finance. Volume: 17. Issue: 7 Publication date: July/August 2003. Page number: 46. © Global Finance Media Inc. Feb 2009. Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.