Iran: All the Shah's Men: The Hidden Story of the CIA Coup in Iran / Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran

By Abrahamian, Ervand | The Middle East Journal, Summer 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Iran: All the Shah's Men: The Hidden Story of the CIA Coup in Iran / Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran

Abrahamian, Ervand, The Middle East Journal


All the Shah's Men: The Hidden Story of the CIA Coup in Iran, by Stephen Kinzer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003. xiv + 228 pages. Notes to p. 243. Bibl. to p. 249. Index to p. 258. $24.95.

Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran, ed. by Mark J. Gasiorowski and Malcom Byrne. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, forthcoming, n.p.

Hayden White, in his classic Metahistory, argues that historical narratives tend to follow one of four basic structures - that of Tragedy, Comedy, Satire, or Romance. If White had taken more interest in American foreign policy, he would have been tempted to add to either Tragedy or Irony the subcategory Benign Intent. Much American writing on US foreign policy begins with the premise that American decision-makers have noble intentions even though the consequences of their actions may not always be so noble. Even if US intervention sometimes paves the way to dictatorship, death squads, mass killings, or (as now in Iraq) a Hobbesian nightmare, these "unforseen and unfortunate occurences" should be severed from the ideals that initially generated that policy - ideals such as Manifest Destiny, spreading civilization (especially Christianity), defending democracy, or, in more recent decades, protecting rthe world from the evils of communism and international terrorism. Other states might be Machiavellian and malevolent, but the United States is altruistic, idealistic, and benevolent.

The two books under review share this underlying theme of benign intent. All the Shah's Men, written by Stephen Kinzer veteran New York Times reporter and author of the well-known Bitter Fruit: The Story of the Coup in Guatemala - is a highly readable story of the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq that ends with an indictment of the ensuing "dictatorship" and with an epilogue which recounts, touchingly, the author's visit to Mossadeq's home and the reminiscences of local villagers. Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran is a collection of conference papers delivered at St. Antony's College, Oxford. Dedicated to "Iranians who have struggled for independence and democracy," the volume is co-edited by Marc Gasiorowski, who years ago established himself as a leading authority on the subject; and by Malcom Byrne, who, as a Deputy Director of the Na-tional Security Archive, has taken on the frustrating task of persuading the US government to declassify documents, including those on the 1953 coup.

In addition to co-editing this volume, Gasiorowski has contributed an article on the coup itself and Byrne a separate one on US policy towards Iran from 1945 to 1953. The volume also contains articles by Homa Katouzian on the problems of democracy in Iran; Fakhreddin Azimi on the internal opposition of Mosaddeq; Maziar Behrooz on the Tudeh Party; William Roger Louis on Britain's role in the coup; and Mary Heiss on how the oil companies mustered a successful international boycott against Iran. All of the articles are meticulously researched and thick with detail. Moreover, many of them, as well as Kinzer's book, use interviews to supplement the available written sources. One could well say that these two books give readers all the details they would ever want to know about the 1953 coup, and more. This is a refreshing contrast to earlier generations of Anglo-American historians, whose treatment of the subject of US involvement in the 1953 coup was silence, denial, or blame of the Shah and Iran (not the United States) for the fact that the coup had not produced a better outcome.

While these two books share the new liberal consensus that the coup was a tragic disaster for Iran as well as for US-Iran relations, they nevertheless conform, on the whole, to the dominant theme of benign intent. They place the crisis squarely in the context of the Cold War, emphasizing that the overwhelming reason for US involvement was fear of, and the desire to save Iran and the Middle East as a whole from international communism.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Iran: All the Shah's Men: The Hidden Story of the CIA Coup in Iran / Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?