Negative Art History: Adorno and the Criticism of Culture

By Eisenman, Stephen F. | Art Journal, Spring 1999 | Go to article overview

Negative Art History: Adorno and the Criticism of Culture


Eisenman, Stephen F., Art Journal


Theodor W Adorno. Aesthetic Theory. Trans., ed., and intro. by Robert HullotKentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. 448 pp. $49.95.

The present moment of art history seems unpropitious for a revival of aesthetics; the concept of culture is instead ascendant. Cultural studies, cultural relativism, cultural difference, cultural nationalism, cultural heritage, and visual culture, for the most part, have taken the place of aesthetics, making work within the latter tradition appear anachronistic and even abstruse. Any theory that suggests the possibility of nonalienated thought, any writing that upholds the ideal of the autonomy of artists and artworks, and any doctrine devoted to beauty is isolated in an intellectual universe dominated by the concept of culture.

Theodor W. Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, originally published in 197o and now adroitly translated from the German by Robert Hullot-Kentor,1 thus appears at an extremely propitious moment in the development of art history and cultural studies. His book stands within the aesthetic tradition of Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten and Immanuel Kant, yet breaks with it at the same time. Adorno's tract is a densely written, yet philosophically expansive, aesthetics, at once negative and positive. It is negative because it rejects any philosophical or artistic doctrine that proposes the present identity of subject and object, or of subject and itself. It is positive because it argues that great works of art (invariably for Adorno, they are the most complex and demanding examples of modernism) possess a cognitive worth, or "truth content" (Wahrheitsgehalt), far exceeding their formal or sociocultural particulars. By means of this plenitude of meaning, "autonomous" works of art, according to Adorno, point to a future world in which human creative potential is finally realized and each person's individuality is at last confirmed.

In contrast to Adorno's dialectical aesthetics, cultural studies-the currently predominant analytic paradigm-is often one-dimensional, affirming the exclusive validity of "local knowledge" and confusing what is and what ought to be.2 "Culture as a common denominator," Adorno writes, "already contains in embryo that schematization and process of cataloging which brings culture within the sphere of administration."3 To speak confidently of Polish, Benin, Jewish, or Andean cultures, in other words, is already to begin to plan their regulation, containment, and fossilization. At the same time, however, that cultural studies freezes, or reifies, culture, it undermines the foundation on which the culture concept is built. By rejecting "master narratives" but still upholding the integrity of national, ethnic, class, and gender-based cultures and subcultures, cultural studies is caught in a true contradiction. Local cultures, after all, are only master narratives in their own, more circumscribed domains. The articulation of global and local knowledge, as well as of history, politics, and culture itself thus remains an incomplete, if not impossible, project for cultural studies. Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, on the other hand, inclines humanistic studies toward a mediated account of the relation between the artwork and society, between cultural fragments and the cultural whole.

Undoubtedly, there is a certain historical inevitability about the eclipse of aesthetics. From its eighteenth-century origins, aesthetics has been rent by internal contradiction, alternately defining its purview as the particularity of works and the generality of the concept of art. Moreover, aestheticians have committed the categorical error of using the immaterial (language) to grasp the very materiality and palpability that constitutes the domain of the aesthetic. They have insisted on what Edgar Allan Poe called "the physical power of words," while simultaneously proclaiming, after Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, the perfect irreconcilability of the plastic and poetic arts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Negative Art History: Adorno and the Criticism of Culture
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.