Products Liability Act and Transnational Litigation in Japan

By Kobayashi, Hideyuki; Furuta, Yoshimasa | Texas International Law Journal, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Products Liability Act and Transnational Litigation in Japan

Kobayashi, Hideyuki, Furuta, Yoshimasa, Texas International Law Journal


On July 1, 1994, the Diet of Japan announced the adoption of the Products Liability Act (PLA),1 which applies to products as defined therein, delivered on and after July 1, 1995. Since the PLA was implemented, six lawsuits have been filed in Japanese courts alleging liability under the PLA, but none have reached judgment on the merits yet.2 In this article, we will summarize the various features of the PLA.3 In addition, we will analyze several selected issues concerning the transnational litigation aspects of products liability lawsuits in Japan-namely, service of process, jurisdiction to adjudicate, parallel litigation, and the recognition of foreign judgments. While the new Code of Civil Procedure of Japan (CCP)4 took effect on January 1, 1998, superseding the previous version of the Code of Civil Procedure (Old CCP),5 no material amendment was made with respect to issues concerning transnational litigation.6 Accordingly, case law and scholarly discussions under the Old CCP are still relevant under the CCP.


A. History

Prior to the passage of the PLA, there was no specific statute or body of law governing questions of products liability in Japan. Instead, the law traditionally dealt with products liability and related issues of consumer protection under the Civil Code of Japan (Civil Code).7 Almost two hundred cases dealing with products liability in Japanese jurisprudence have developed on the theory of liability in contract (when a contractual relationship of some type exists between a plaintiff and a defendant) or on the theory of liability in tort under the Civil Code (in those instances when a contractual relationship does not exist between a plaintiff and a defendant).8 Under both theories, courts have generally required a finding of negligence to establish the defendant's liability.9 In cases where products liability is an issue, usually no contractual relationship exists, and therefore most cases are brought under the tort theory. However, in some cases based on tort theory, courts have imposed a very high duty of care on the defendant or have tentatively recognized a presumption of negligence.lo This especially occurs in cases involving food and medical products. Accordingly, the liability of the defendant in these cases has become akin to strict liability. "

On December 10, 1993, the Economic Welfare Council, an auxiliary organ of the Economic Planning Agency of Japan, released its 14th Report (EWC Report),12 which recommended that the Japanese government enact a products liability act. The PLA, which is the result of numerous draft versions debated over many years, is modeled closely on the Directive on Liability for Defective Products that the European Union (formerly the European Community) adopted in 1985 (Products Liability Directive),13 rather than on the substantial body of products liability law that has developed in the United States.

B. General Features of the PLA

The primary purpose of the PLA is to protect consumers against injuries caused by defective products, and thereby, to improve the national living standard and the development of the economy generally.'4 Key provisions include Article 2, which prescribes the range of products subject to the law, particularly manufactured or processed items of movable property,l5 and Article 3, which establishes the standard of strict liability.tfi Exemptions from liability are set forth in Article 4 and can be procured by proving that a product meets the "development risk" or "state-of-the-art" standard for such products, or that the product is a component or ingredient manufactured without negligence and according to specifications provided by the manufacturer of a product into which the components or ingredients are incorporated.17 Liability may also be limited under Article 5, which provides certain time limits within which a plaintiff must claim damages, and also stipulates special time limits for damages accumulated over long periods or that are discovered later.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Products Liability Act and Transnational Litigation in Japan


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?