Is the Second Amendment an Individual or a Collective Right: United States V. Emerson's Revolutionary Interpretation of the Right to Bear Arms

By Busch, Michael | St. John's Law Review, Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

Is the Second Amendment an Individual or a Collective Right: United States V. Emerson's Revolutionary Interpretation of the Right to Bear Arms


Busch, Michael, St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

The protections of the Bill of Rights are among the most important safeguards against an oppressive government provided by the Constitution.1 Included in these protections is the Second Amendment (the "Amendment"), which provides: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."2 Although approximately two hundred years have passed since its inception, the scope of the Amendment remains in dispute.3 One common question is whether the Amendment applies to state as well as federal governments.4 Other questions are the amount of protection extended by the right to bear arms5 and to whom these protections extend.6

Although these issues cannot easily be separated, this Comment will focus, to the extent possible, on who may claim the protection of the Amendment. At times the protection afforded by the Amendment is characterized as an individual right;7 at other times it is viewed as a collective right.8

In determining which view is embodied in the Amendment, this Comment will first consider its historical origin. However illuminating the historical background of the Amendment may be, it is not necessarily dispositive of what the Framers actually intended. For this reason, this Comment will next consider the wording of the Amendment, the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Amendment, the application of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the social considerations at issue.

This distinction is crucial because the more collectively the right is interpreted, the more broadly Congress can legislate to restrict the right to bear arms.9 This distinction was first implicated in 1927, when Congress passed the first major federal legislation on gun control.10 After the Supreme Court opinion in United States v. Miller,11 most lower federal courts have interpreted the protection of the Second Amendment as a collective right.12 Surprisingly, the Supreme Court has stayed relatively silent on the issue, never stating clearly whether the right is collective or individual.13 Although the Supreme Court recently denied certiorari,14 it may be forced to reconsider the issue in light of the Fifth Circuit's recent departure from the traditional interpretation.15

Recently, in United States v. Emerson,16 the Fifth Circuit held that the Amendment confers an individual right to bear arms.17 On August 28, 1998, Sacha Emerson filed for divorce in Tom Greene County, Texas.18 Mrs. Emerson, among other things, requested a temporary restraining order.19 On September 14, 1998, the state judge issued a restraining order, enjoining Mr. Emerson from engaging in twenty-two enumerated acts.20 A five-count indictment was returned against Mr. Emerson on December 8, 1998.21 After dropping counts two through five, the government proceeded to prosecute the remaining charge,22 alleging that Mr. Emerson unlawfully possessed, "in and affecting interstate commerce," a firearm while subject to the restraining order--a violation of 18 U.S.C. [sec] 922(g).23 In response, Mr. Emerson contended that [sec] 922 violated his right to bear arms.24 The district court agreed and granted Emerson's motion for dismissal.25 On appeal,26 the Fifth Circuit reversed the trial court's determination after a lengthy analysis of the Second Amendment.27 The court held that [sec] 922 was not a violation of Emerson's Second Amendment rights.28 The court construed the right to bear arms as an individual right but stated:

[T]hat does not mean that those rights may never be made subject to any limited, narrowly tailored specific exceptions or restrictions for particular cases that are reasonable and not inconsistent with the right of Americans generally to individually keep and bear their private arms as historically understood in this country.29

In examining the different interpretations of the right to bear arms, the court identified three major divisions of understanding:30 (1) a state rights, or collective right, in which the Amendment only functions to recognize a state's right to arm a militia;31 (2) an individual right that only applies to persons engaged in a state's militia;32 and (3) a pure individual right enjoyed by all persons of qualified age and standing.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is the Second Amendment an Individual or a Collective Right: United States V. Emerson's Revolutionary Interpretation of the Right to Bear Arms
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.