Fiscal Autonomy of Korean Local Governments and Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s

By Kim, Pan S.; Kim, Jae-Young | Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

Fiscal Autonomy of Korean Local Governments and Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s


Kim, Pan S., Kim, Jae-Young, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management


ABSTRACT. This paper reviews Korean intergovernmental relations in the 1990s with an emphasis on fiscal relations among the different levels of the government. In the 1990s, Korea reinvigorated its system of local autonomy first established in the sixties. A major issue in the implementation of this system is the presence of vertical and horizontal disparities in local fiscal capacity. Although some efforts have been made to transfer tax sources from central government to local governments or establish local transfer (block grants), fiscal autonomy still remains below expectation, jeopardizing the realization of full local autonomy. This paper is an effort to look into these issues and search for solutions.

INTRODUCTION

Local autonomy was introduced in 1949 by President Syngman Rhee (1948-1960), but was eliminated by the military coup in 1961. The local council was abolished until 1992 and all heads of local authorities were then appointed by the central government until 1995. In 1992 local autonomy was reestablished with elections for council members started as part of a move to democracy in Korea. Now, each local authority (city, county, metropolitan city district, metropolitan city, and province) has a local council and head of each local authority elected by the residents every four years.

So in the 1990s, the local autonomy system started to be reinvigorated after a long suspension. Although intergovernmental relations are still at the early stage, an institutional framework for local autonomy is now in place.

Local elections and the ensuing reforms revived and strengthened democracy in the Korean localities with mixed results. Positive developments include local democracy, enhanced local government responsiveness to citizens, and citizens' recognition of their rights in local affairs including issues such as regional development and general welfare. After the local elections, some negative conflicts such as self-centered mismanagement also attracted national attention. Neither the elected officials nor the public bureaucracy were fully capable of solving all the problems in their jurisdictions because, for a long period of time in the past, local government officials had been accustomed to being dependent on central government's guidelines.

Fiscal dependency of local authorities on higher levels of government is not unique in Korea, but such dependency is more severe in Korea than in other industrialized countries. For instance, over 50% of Korean local governments are not able to pay employee salaries with their own tax revenues. Their financial independence indicators are very low. In several rural areas, local governments can generate only around 10% of their revenues from taxes. In other words, the Korean central government still dominantly controls the revenue resources, leaving only a few taxes for local governments to collect (city and county governments collect resident tax, property tax, car tax, cigarette tax, agricultural income tax, butchery tax, and urban planning tax). As of 2000, the proportion of local taxes was still less than 20% of overall tax revenues in Korea. Fiscal stress and intergovernmental relationships remain the most pressing issues Korean local governments face in the implementation of the concept of local autonomy.

This paper examines these issues. It will begin with a brief review of the theoretical debates on fiscal decentralization, then discuss the changing context of Korea's system of local autonomy, and proceed to review Korea's system of intergovernmental finance, followed by the authors' discussions and conclusions.

DEBATES ON FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION

While there are several dimensions of governmental decentralization, such as the extent of delegation of powers, of legal responsibilities, and of authority over personnel and organizations, fiscal decentralization seems to be the one that calls for the most attention. As Deil Wright (1988, p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fiscal Autonomy of Korean Local Governments and Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.