High Court Reverses Alabama Court's "Cramped Reading" of Interstate Commerce

By Rome, Donald Lee | Dispute Resolution Journal, August-October 2003 | Go to article overview

High Court Reverses Alabama Court's "Cramped Reading" of Interstate Commerce


Rome, Donald Lee, Dispute Resolution Journal


COMMENTARY BY DONALD LEE ROME

In a per curiam opinion in Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., No. 02-1295, dated June 2, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court strongly endorsed a broad interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act's "involving commerce" requirement. The opinion simultaneously granted certiorari, and without hearing argument on the issue, reversed a judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama denying enforcement of an arbitration clause in a commercial loan restructuring agreement.

Alafabco, an Alabama construction company, claimed that Citizens Bank, an Alabama lender, had encouraged it to bid on a large construction contract in Courtland, Ala., but then refused to provide the capital necessary to complete the project. Using funds to complete the work that otherwise would have been used to repay existing obligations to Citizens as a result of many prior lending transactions with the bank, Alafabco became delinquent in its loan payments. This led to a restructuring of its debt with Citizens. The debt restructure agreement provided for arbitration, as did a prior debt restructure agreement with the bank.

Thereafter, Alafabco filed a lawsuit in Alabama state court against the bank and its officers, alleging numerous causes of action all arising out of the bank's refusal to provide capital to complete the Courtland project. Citizens moved to compel arbitration and the court granted the motion. However, the Alabama Supreme Court reversed. In its view, the narrow issue was whether the debt restructuring agreement between the two Alabama parties, by itself, had a "substantial effect on interstate commerce." If so, the Federal Arbitration Act would apply. But the court found that it did not because there was "no showing that any portion of the restructured debt was actually attributable to interstate transactions; that the funds comprising that debt originated out-of-state, or that the restructured debt was inseparable from any out-of-state projects."

The Supreme Court's short opinion agreeing to hear the case and overturning the state court's ruling without hearing argument is not surprising, given the facts of the case and prior Supreme Court pronouncements on the extent of Congress's Commerce Clause power. The Court itself cited three reasons for its ruling. First, Alafabco did business throughout the Southeast and had used loan proceeds to finance construction projects in at least three states. Second, the debt was secured by business assets involved in interstate commerce. Third, the transactions the parties entered into represented the "general practice" in commercial lending, an area subject to federal control. Reiterating its broad view of the FAA's application to transactions affecting commerce, the Court said, "Congress's Commerce Clause power 'may be exercised in individual cases without showing any specific effect upon interstate commerce' if the aggregate economic activity at issue would represent 'a general practice . …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

High Court Reverses Alabama Court's "Cramped Reading" of Interstate Commerce
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.