Keep on Truckin'

By Rabkin, Jeremy | The American Spectator, July 1999 | Go to article overview

Keep on Truckin'


Rabkin, Jeremy, The American Spectator


A court vests legislative powers in a regulatory agency.

Americans love gadgets. Yet some that seem wonderful at the outset, such as answering machines and mobile phones, prove tyrants in the end. Others-like the fabulous combination onion peeler and tomato masher, available only to viewers of late-night television and not sold in stores-turn out to be junk within hours of being unwrapped. When judges go after new conceptual gadgets, it usually takes years to determine their value; and in the meantime, court watchers get some hints about judicial tastes. Two cases decided this spring are particularly intriguing in this regard.

The May 14 ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in American Trucking Associations v. EPA caused as much of a stir (at least in Washington) as any ruling this year by the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision was widely praisedand in some quarters, denounced-for seeming to revive the non-delegation doctrine. But it will be a long time before we can be sure that it has done that, and if so, even longer before we know what the consequences will be.

The case deals with new air quality standards promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency under the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments. That this "case" was actually a consolidation of more than fifty separate challenges to the same regulations gives an idea of the stakes. Three state governments challenged the EPA's new rules as excessively severe, as did truckers and other small plaintiffs; while six states demanding more stringent standards were joined by environmental and health advocacy groups. More than a hundred lawyers are listed as contributing to various briefs. The issues are so mind-numbingly technical and complex that those lawyers must have run up enormous fees. But the various challengers surely thought the money well spent, since the EPA's new standards will constrain commercial activity across the country.

In the most interesting part of the decision, the court held that the EPA had not adequately explained how it set pollution standards. The gist of the argument seems quite clear: It is as if Congress commanded the EPA to select "big guys" and the agency announced that it would evaluate candidates based on height and weight, but reveal no cut-off point. A reasonable person would respond, "How tall? How heavy?" Congress did not provide adequate guidance in the statute, the court complained, and the EPA's explanation did not do enough to clarify the relevant standards or criteria for regulatory action. As applied by the EPA, the statute violates the constitutional principle against improper delegation of legislative power.

The idea behind the non-delegation doctrine is that when the Constitution says that "legislative powers.. .shall be vested in Congress," it means what it says. Congress should be responsible for making the laws and it should not pass this responsibility off to presidents or bureaucrats with no more than a meaningless admonition to attend to "the public interest." This doctrine has not been seriously applied since the 193o's-which is why so many regulatory agencies are licensed to regulate on such vague and open-ended charters.

The Trucking Associations ruling did not apply a full-strength version of the non-delegation doctrine. Instead of calling the statute inherently unconstitutional, it said that it would be so unless the EPA could defend an interpretation of the statute that gave it a more precise and limiting character. So instead of demanding that Congress do better, the court told the EPA to offer more explanation.

Conservatives have spoken warmly about the non-delegation doctrine, partly because they assume that if Congress has to take responsibility for costly regulatory controls it will enact fewer of them. No one was very surprised when the D.C. Circuit panel in this case split along party lines, with Judges Williams and Ginsburg (both Reagan appointees) speaking up for the delegation doctrine, while Judge Tatel (a Clinton appointee) dissented. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Keep on Truckin'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.