Antiaging Medicine: Promise or Peril?

By Haas, Jane Glenn | Aging Today, September/October 2003 | Go to article overview

Antiaging Medicine: Promise or Peril?


Haas, Jane Glenn, Aging Today


To age-or antiage? That may be the question for millions of midlife boomers beginning to experience age-related debilities, ranging from serious illnesses to decreased libidos. The promise-or the peril-of antiaging medicine sparked debate at the recent Joint Conference of the National Council on the Aging and the American Society on Aging in Chicago, but discussants reached only one conclusion: nostrums, pills and potions touting eternal youthfulness and treating aging as a curable disease are bad medicine.

Although advertisements for antiaging remedies raise the hackles of serious researchers, some physicians insist that unwanted effects of aging have solutions-such as hormones and cosmetic surgery-that can legitimately improve the quality of life for an aging population.

ANTI-ANTIAGING

Scientists on the anti-antiaging medicine side of the debate argue that people live longer now not because science has altered the way we age but because people have changed the way they live. This is the view of S. Jay Olshansky, a professor at the School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, and researcher at the Center on Aging at the University of Chicago. Olshansky insists, "There is no truth to the fountain of youth through medicine." In fact, "No Truth to the Fountain of Youth" was the title of an unusual statement published last year in Scientific American (June 2002)-a statement that was coauthored by Olshansky and signed by 51 authorities in science and medicine. It raised critical concerns about false claims that anyone can reverse human aging. Olshansky aims to debunk antiaging gurus, such as Ronald Klatz, founder and president of the American Academy of AntiAging Medicine, based in Chicago, who claim that human lifespans can be extended to 120, 130, 140 years or more.

"It is highly improbable that life expectancy is ever going to go past 85, unless we find some way to modify the biological rate of aging, which is currently not possible," Olshansky asserted. "Quite frankly, even if we eliminated all of the major causes of death today-the three main killers of heart disease, cancer and stroke-life expectancy probably would not rise above 95. And even if we eliminated everything but accidental mortality, we wouldn't reach a life expectancy of 100."

Olshansky holds that once humans fulfill their purpose of procreation, extended life becomes unnecessary from nature's viewpoint. Civilization has pushed the lifespan to its limits, he believes, and the only way lives will be extended much further is by altering the basic biological rate of aging itself. "What we are now doing is living well beyond our reproductive periods and therefore it should be no surprise that we see things go wrong with our bodies as we age," he says.

UNETHICAL EXPERIMENTS

Although Olshansky agrees with practitioners of antiaging medicine that it is worthwhile to advocate lifestyle changes, such as improved diet and exercise, he takes issue with hormones and nutritional supplements touted as extending the duration and quality of life or even reversing aging.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Antiaging Medicine: Promise or Peril?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.