Executive Summary: Evaluating Issues in Privatizing Social Security

Social Security Bulletin, January 1, 1999 | Go to article overview

Executive Summary: Evaluating Issues in Privatizing Social Security


The National Academy of Social Insurance is pleased to issue the final report of its study panel on Evaluating Issues in Privatizing Social Security The panel's charge was to address the major technical issues raised by two generic types of Social Security reform proposals involving elements of privatization as part of restoring long-term fiscal balance to the program. One type of reform would retain the current defined-benefit structure of Social Security, but build and maintain a larger trust fund partially invested in private securities. The other would represent a marked departure from the current structure of Social Security by establishing individual defined-contribution accounts with investment choices that include private securities. (The panel was not asked to consider more traditional approaches to restoring fiscal balance to the program, since the analytic issues involved therein are already reasonably well understood.) Reform of Social Security has risen to the top of the national agenda since the Academy initiated this project in mid- 1996, with concerns about privatization playing a major role in the debate. Thus, the findings of this panel are particularly timely and salient.

Executive Summary

This study explores issues that arise under proposals (1) to build and maintain a sizable Social Security Trust Fund, partially invested in stocks and corporate bonds, and (2) to introduce individual defined-contribution accounts. The report analyzes the potential effects of such proposals and examines many of the related implementation issues.

The report is organized around five policy questions:

(1) Should we move toward more advance funding of Social Security obligations, or should these obligations continue to be financed on a pay-as-you-go basis with only a contingency reserve?

(2) Should the Social Security Trust Fund invest in a diversified portfolio that includes stocks and corporate bonds, or should it continue to invest only in Treasury bonds? Should Social Security individual accounts have access to diversified portfolios that include stocks and corporate bonds?

(3) Should the reformed system create individual (funded defined-contribution) accounts, or should it remain a single collective fund with a defined-benefit formula?

(4) If individual accounts are adopted, how much choice should workers be allowed in selecting investments, and in the timing and form of payments from the accounts? Should individual accounts be voluntary or mandatory?

(5) If individual accounts are adopted, should the reformed system move toward private and decentralized collection of contributions, management of investments, and payment of annuities, or should these functions be administered by a government agency (the Treasury or the Social Security Administration)?

Following are the Panel's analyses, findings, and summary views on these five questions. A recommendation by the Panel is not necessarily unanimous, but has the support of at least three-fourths of the members of the Panel; some qualifications and opposing viewpoints are presented in the text or in the notes. Some technical terms are defined in the Glossary [of the full report].

The term "privatization" is used in a variety of ways in current Social Security discussions. We distinguish between three terms: advance funding, portfolio diversification, and individual accounts:

(1) By increased advance funding we mean building and maintaining greater total balances for Social Security, whether this is done in individual accounts or in the Social Security Trust Fund.

(2) By portfolio diversification we mean investing funds (either from individual accounts or from the Trust Fund) into a broad range of assets, including stocks and corporate bonds.

(3) By individual accounts, we mean replacing all or part of the current defined-benefit system with a definedcontribution system of individual accounts held in individual workers' names. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Executive Summary: Evaluating Issues in Privatizing Social Security
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.